IT’S GETTING BAD! James Webb's Finding Ends Debate in Physics

The long-awaited, groundbreaking discovery of the James Webb Space Telescope marks an unprecedented milestone in the history of physics. Since its launch, this prodigious instrument has unraveled cosmic mysteries that have been shrouded in scientific debate for decades.

Equipped with state-of-the-art technology and extraordinary observational capabilities, the James Webb has presented conclusive evidence and shed light on disputed theories in the field of physics. Its high-resolution images and precise data have enabled scientists to confirm and push the boundaries of our current understanding of the nature of the universe.

This landmark finding has been a turning point in theories such as quantum physics, quantum gravity, dark matter, and has resolved controversies between established physics paradigms and emerging ideas. The evidence collected by the James Webb has led to a unanimous consensus among the scientific community, ending long debates and opening new doors to a deeper understanding of the cosmos.

The legacy of James Webb's discovery not only transcends theoretical physics, but also inspires new research, revolutionary theories and technological breakthroughs that will transform our understanding of the universe and our relationship with it. This achievement marks not only the end of a scientific debate, but the beginning of a new era of cosmic discovery and knowledge with no apparent limits.

[nicksaveka]

We are in something experimental that starts and restarts and gets redone every time they decided to

[dendarius]

The universe was created 79.8 billion years to 80 billion years ago. Symmetry breaking baryonand anti baryon also collapse

[JasonTabile]

So, the Buddha was kinda right, all along? Cycle of births and rebirths, aeons upon aeons...

[ronaldkemp]

Excellent content. Thank-you.

One thing is for certain. Sir Roger Penrose never published a paper, article or book claiming the JWST would discover old, fully grown galaxies as far as the telescope is able to see, even further than 13.8 billion light-years away. Even with a cyclical universe a big bang would have had to happen prior to seeing massive black holes. The temperature variations in the CMB support old massive galaxies in the early universe, not a cyclical big bang, big crunch, cyclical model Penrose proposed. If a big crunch happened we would NOT see old massive galaxies further than 14 billion light-years away. We'd see the hot dense state of the universe everywhere in every direction some 13.8 billion light years away of the previous big crunch. There would be nothing beyond the time frame of this universe.

But there are old, bright, large, fully grown galaxies fully developed into large spiral and smooth ellipticals. Smooth meaning they are extremely old didn't form rapidly from galaxy collisions. It takes tens of billions of years for a galaxy to settle down, take on a smooth round shape after two have collided. The distant galaxies are not only massive, more than 10 times larger than our own galaxy but they are smooth, indicating they are not only massive but they are old. They have taken on a smooth elliptical shape. They produce the impossible early galaxy paradox. A cyclical universe can't explain them and it wasn't predicted by his theory.

In my book titled SECRET UNIVERSE: GRAVITY by Ron Kemp, on page 48 I quote "The JWST, James Webb Space Telescope will discover old, fully grown galaxies as far as the telescope can see, further than 13.8 billion light-years away." Then it goes on to explain why the telescope would find old galaxies not young ones. The book was published 09-27-2021, 3 months before the JWST was launched and almost a year before the first CEERS survey was released. I know exactly why the distant universe contains old, massive galaxies.