Bradley Fighting Vehicle vs. M113 and Stryker What Sets Them Apart

preview_player
Показать описание
Imagine a busy battlefield filled with armored vehicles. The Bradley, resembling an armored titan, unleashes its formidable 25mm Chain Gun, punctuating the air with fiery bursts. Alongside, the M113 stands robust and steadfast, carrying soldiers who are ready to jump out and secure important areas. Meanwhile, the Stryker, swift and agile, strikes like a modern-day cavalry with its 105mm gun. These armored giants bring their own set of strengths to the battlefield. But what sets them apart from one another? How do they measure up in terms of firepower, versatility, and battlefield prowess? Join us as we delve into these military marvels, uncovering the distinctive features that make them the stalwarts of modern armed forces.

Subscribe Now :
Рекомендации по теме
Комментарии
Автор

The M113 (M1113 typo in the video name) does not protect against RPGs and is outclassed in every other way.
It is old and shouldn't de compared to modern systems.

pieter
Автор

This show contradicts itself throughout the whole show.
One moment it says the Bradley carrys the least soilders, then it says the Stryker carries less..?

UFO-Ark
Автор

I like them all, but I see the Stryker as the most versatile and overall goodie of the 3.

PpAirO
Автор

I would go with the Stryker there's like 10 versions including one with a 25mm chaingun im sure you can mount a TOW if you wanted then you'd have the exact same offensive capability as a Bradley except significantly faster & with APS standard & a RPG cage + the V bottom hull i honestly think the Stryker has a higher survivability than the Bradley like Ali said float like a butterfly sting like a bee now if was working alongside an Abrams I'd probably go with the Bradley but that would be the only reason I would go with a Bradley over a Styker

Edit/PS: the Stryker is also much more quieter due to the wheels & stealth is a huge advantage as well as it being lighter thus more easily transported via helicopter negating the slight off road edge of tracks & the Bradley

duncasaur
Автор

Are you saying the stryker 😂has a 105 mm Canon and can carry 9 soldiers? Are you kidding me?

And the stryker didn't come with trophy system as standard 🙄 wtf are you talking about?

WarWithIn
Автор

When it comes to desing, the M113 definitely is my favorite! Can this vehicle be modernised and equipt with for example a 25mm gun and/or TOW/Stinger missile launcher?

Gedeon_N
Автор

How is a 105mm cannon not as powerful as a 25mm gun? Seems a little ridiculous to me.

xylem
Автор

Bradley is a legendary vehicle which gave its name to a small region near Robotine in Ukraine.
Seriously, why do they call this area like “BRADLEY SQUARE”???

KilroyishereYT
Автор

The stryker does not have a 105mm gun that is a variant of the stryker which doesnt carry any troops

emgab
Автор

The m113 is not a fighting vehicle and its armor won't stop anything bigger than ak47
Think of it more like a truck used to transport supplies to the front lines.

squatchpnw
Автор

Nothing. Both are easily destroyed by FPV's and artillery without air support 😆

risbolensky
Автор

To be frank all this so called game changer machines doesn't have a chance against Russian shovel. They will be good for burning to keep warm in winter.

knowledge-is-infinite
Автор

I don't know about differences but i can say that they have one similarity that this western vehicle's poorly performed & didn't stand against Russia😂😂😂

warfootage
Автор

Hi guys, in a dummy and l know absolutely nothing about armoured vehicles but im going to make videos about them anyways!!! 😂😂

JamesOMalley-hbtf