Man Sues Bicyclist for Hitting His Car | Part 1

preview_player
Показать описание
Matt claims Jeff is at fault for hitting his car with his bike, but was Matt making an illegal turn?

#JudgeJudy

The Original! There’s only ONE Judge Judy. Visit our website for where to watch, weekdays.

Рекомендации по теме
Комментарии
Автор

The defendant cringing on behalf of the plaintiff is everything 😂

jhimlyb
Автор

Haha. What a fool. Construction signs are in effect EVEN WHEN THERE'S NO CONSTRUCTION! That goes for speeding in a construction zone as well.

bdso
Автор

🤣🤣🤣 the breathe the plaintiff took when JJ challenged him on the sign. Just go home plaintiff. 🤣🤣🤣

overcominglifestrials
Автор

As someone who commutes to work on a bike, I'm constantly looking out for vehicles and pedestrians. I also study up on the laws for my area for cyclists to know what I can and cannot do.

Yumi_Jay
Автор

The defendant was a really nice guy not to countersue.
If there was damage to the car, there had to have been damage to the bike and possibly the defendant.

When will people ever learn, you cannot come to court hoping to win with dirty hands.

CarolineWolterHall
Автор

JJ: Do you have the sign?

Lmao that made me laugh! Did she want him to steal city property lol!

thatsassyrepublican
Автор

Omg the plaintiff reminds me SO much of Big Ed!!!!

erinnicole
Автор

I wish she would’ve made Byrd giving his analysis of the evidence pics part of the show. I love how he always peaks at em before handing them to JJ.

jamesmitchell-qt
Автор

It's AMAZING How Many People That Drive Don't Actually KNOW The Rules Of The Road.

carylanncompton
Автор

He looks like someone shrunk Danny Trejo's character Machete and then made him go through business school

VinzentC
Автор

You drive a car your supposed to watch for anything and anyone.

maranatha
Автор

i'm surprised this actually has a part 2

jegca
Автор

Sign or not, When a vehicule cross lane they should always check for others on that lane (he crossed the bicycle lane while turning right) at least where i am the blame would've been on the driver regardless of the signage.

khuu
Автор

Usually with cases like this, it is the cyclist's fault because they aren't obeying traffic laws, and the plaintiff comes in with irrefutable evidence of such. Pretty ballsy of this guy to come to court when he clearly was in the wrong lol (based on what I see here, may get surprised in the next vid)

Kaboomboo
Автор

Seconds in watching! The plaintiff has no case lol 😂

Talkswithtee
Автор

The plaintiff looks like he could be related to Ed from 90 Day Fiance.

iheartdates
Автор

Is the plaintiff related to the infamous "no-neck Ed"?

magicicle
Автор

How did this one make tv? What’s his defence to turning right? 😂

sRockChick
Автор

I live in Australia. One of the rules in the book says. Always give way to pedestrian. Even if your pissed. Give at least a metre away from cyclists.

ruthlessrude
Автор

plaintiff should not be driving if they can't read signs!! what a clown 🤣😂🤣

TheJellymonty