Supreme Court Rules To Uphold Restrictive Arizona Election Law

Connect with NBC News Online!

#SCOTUS #Arizona #Vote

Supreme Court Rules To Uphold Restrictive Arizona Election Law

[mikebaird]

Oh yes God forbid that somebody should actually have to show their ID to vote when you have to show an ID to drive and to get our plane the world is going to end now for the Democrats

[FREEDOM-qbdb]

Did you know, you CANNOT get into an NAACP meeting without you guessed it *PROOF OF IDENTIFICATION*

[fredhaslitt]

Yes if you can wait in line for a test that you probably don't need, you can stand in line to vote.

[veritasdesigns]

It’s restrictive but showing an ID to broad a plane is not

[zfloyd]

I don't have any problem with voter restrictions, as long as they don't make it completely impossible for some people to vote. This is because voting should not be super easy. It should be something that requires responsibility. However, what I do have a big problem with is that Arizona's law allows presidential elections can be overturned with little evidence of fraud. That takes it way too far for me.

[omikredarhcs]

They will do the same to the lawsuit against Georgia also.

[Sydgekd]

The Supreme Court should have a 2 four year term limit. If the PRESIDENT of the United state have two terms to run and that the highest in the land know In the way should supreme court can stay on till they retire or die.

[enochfinch]

In a country where all men are created equal. It seems not all voting rights were.

[JDinky]

The voting laws are restrictive only in the sense that they will prevent pay-for-vote schemes and the submission of fraudulent ballots. Thanks Supreme Court!!!

[robb]

Another victory for De6and the Constitution! Now we need a LAW that requires an Arizona level AUDIT for every precinct for every election!

[Pennsylvania]

It's a good decision, show your ID and stop complaining about it. lol

[dalelange]

Since the SCOTUS ruled as they did then the law should NOT be referred to as restrictive. Fair would be a more accurate description of the law... the people have spoken.

[gloriamartens]

If that’s the case then why did Biden come out and speak against the court’s decision

[jennifercuddy]

That’s so disgusting. Traitors, seriously. We should be protesting in front of the courthouse.