Can You Trust The Press? | 5 Minute Video

Is the press trustworthy? Can we believe what reporters and journalists tell us? Judith Miller, Pulitzer Prize-winning former reporter for the New York Times, explains why Americans' trust in the news media has fallen, and why that matters.

Download Pragerpedia on your iPhone or Android! Thousands of sources and facts at your fingertips.

FOLLOW us!
PragerU is on Snapchat!

JOIN PragerFORCE!

Script:

Liberal or conservative, male or female, young or old, Americans love to bash the news media. Once among the nation's most trusted institutions, the news media have fallen from grace.

According to Gallup, even as recently as 2000 a majority of Americans trusted the press; by 2015 it had fallen to 40 percent; and lower than that, 36 percent, among those 18 to 49. It's hard to see how this decline will be reversed. The industry has become politically polarized and, in the highly competitive age of multiple 24-hour cable news channels and the Internet, it's under severe financial pressure. And this compounds an even deeper problem – failing journalistic standards.

In the 1950s, the media universe consisted mainly of a few national television broadcast networks, and local TV and radio stations, most of which got much of their “news” from major wire services and the nation's large newspapers. Most journalists were committed to producing “objective” journalism – fact-based stories independent of the government and of political parties. A reporter's job was to report, not offer opinion or advocate. Presented with the facts, it was up to readers to make their own judgments about news events. Opinions were supposed to be confined to editorial and op-ed pages.

That world no longer exists.

This lack of objectivity and the decline of standards is one reason, though not the only one, why newspapers and news magazines are a declining industry. According to Pew Research, print revenue from newspaper sales has declined from $47 billion in 2006 to $16 billion in 2014. Digital sales haven't come close to making up the difference. Most papers have been forced to cut operating expenses: slash staff and close bureaus – overseas, in particular. Ironically, there are more stories than ever to cover and fewer staff than ever to cover them.

This lack of information from professional journalists has been filled by a new source – social media and the blogosphere. When the Iraq war, which I covered for the New York Times, began in 2003, there were roughly one hundred thousand bloggers. Only a few years later, there were an estimated twenty-seven million.

The Internet as a news source has obvious pluses and minuses. On the plus side is that information is spread widely and instantly. The minuses have to do with the fact that the quality of reporting varies dramatically. It's not easy to separate the wheat from the chaff.
Furthermore, many sites, including mainstream sites, have abandoned traditional journalistic practices and standards in search of more and more “eyeballs.” Objectivity, once the gold standard of reporting, is now often seen as old-fashioned, a ratings loser. When success is measured mainly in terms of “clicks,” the outrageous beats the sober just about every time.
Inserting opinion, even in the middle of a news story, is a way in which journalists can distinguish themselves. And in mainstream media outlets, those opinions overwhelmingly tend to be liberal. This might not be so bad if journalists acknowledged their bias. But they almost never do. Yet the bias is obvious.

[Lord_Volkner]

"Those who don't read the newspaper are uninformed; those who do are misinformed."
-Mark Twain

[JamesSavik]

The media is so biased, watching them is like watching cheerleaders.

[wildinfernoninety]

Very simple, if you're the weather channel just tell me if it rained and not why rain is good or bad.

[K-nz]

Haven’t watched news in 4 years. Stress level significantly

[MasterMenahem]

The MSM has gotten so bad that I think the weather channel is more accurate.

[polyverse]

You left out over 90% of media outlets are owned and operated by 5 major corporations. Could that have anything to do with the media decline. LOL the age of the gatekeeper is over.

[MrThereybrasanroj]

When you see a presidential candidate and a big channel news worried about a cartoon frog you know the media is a joke.

[markmarshall]

Thank you. It is like a breath of fresh air to hear the truth.

[DonLumpkin]

Thank you, so much, Judy, for your insightful report! You are correct:
When news services are required to bow before the alter of RATINGS, and, ultimately, PROFITS, it is inevitable that the TRUTH will take a backseat.
Our FOUNDERS believed that our system of government would ONLY work if we had an informed citizenry. It is an OMINOUS SIGN when large numbers of Americans no longer feel that they can trust the PRESS, to provide truly fair and unbiased reporting.

[pk]

It's the subtle biases that crack me up. One headline might read "Congressman Arrested For Taking Bribes." When you read though the article, around the last paragraph it might mention the party affiliation, or they leave it out completely. 9 times out of 10, the party affiliation for that type of headline is reserved for Democrats.
On the flip side, you almost always get this headline, "Republican Congressman Arrested For Taking Bribes."

[lthinks]

"Can you trust the press?"
NO.

[kitianajohnson]

if the MSM told me the sun was going to come up tomorrow, I would bring a flashlight!

[georgewashington]

Can You Trust The Press? I assume this is a rhetorical question.

[bdfgdfghdfhgfitdfyutdtydry]

Just like Wikipedia. Don't read the article, read the source.

[winter]

As a liberal, I pretty much agree with this video. Most of the news are biased one way or another. People who on the right read or listen right-wing media; the people who on the left read or listen left-wing media. Most people live in right-wing or left wing bubble; and they rarely ever hear or listen to the opposing side. As a liberal, I want my views to be challenged and thus I read and listen right-wing media. I listen to Mark Levin, Glenn Beck and Sean Hannity on regular basis.

[rachelbusby]

This is so true. I recently saw a newspaper headline that read: 'Syrian man dies in blast in Germany.' However, when I read the story, I discovered that this Syrian man was actually a terrorist who had detonated his suicide vest in Germany. The media was very manipulative when reporting this by making the headline trick people into believing that an innocent person died in a bomb blast. But that person was actually a Syrian refugee and an Islamic State terrorist, and caused the bomb blast in the first place.

[Mrmagil]

"As much as people like to bash the press, they'd prefer to trust it."

True. :(

[measl]

*Oh. The IRONY! Judith Miller talking about corrupted press!*

[phihoangnguyen]

NYTimes is trying to destroy Mr. Trump on his tax return while Mrs. Clinton's massive e-mail scandal has barely got headlines.

[anyanyausagi]

I don't think the drop of trust is necessarily a bad thing. Maybe people started acting more critically towards the media that they consume, therefore the harsher criticism?