Turning set theory into the world's worst conlang

I feel like the title kinda explains the video, I turned set theory into a conlang and it's very bad (Deliberately).

The music playing for most of the video is by Unicorn Heads and can be obtained from the YouTube audio library.

Thanks monstergarden.

[RandomAndgit]

Hey everyone, here are a few notes:
Yes, the language is Turing complete
Yes, the sets being ordered technically makes them lists, not sets
Thanks to everyone who pointed out that the > at 0:57 is pointing the wrong way. You can now stop doing that.
The language definitely could be streamlined a bit more, I might make a follow-up video at some point which uses fewer than 10 words.

[TotalTimoTime]

You can cut two more words from your vocabulary by dropping And, Not and Or and replacing them with a single Nand operator. Nand by itself is enough to define all possible boolean operations.

[suspicioussand]

Bro is NOT allowed within a 500 feet radius around a language education facility

[Cruuvo]

When your conlang first necessitates the translation of the mathematical axioms in order to invent nouns

[SuperflyMN]

If magic were real, this would probably be the kind of language you'd have to write spells in. It'd be like having a terminal for the universe, where you can write commands to move specific particles in a certain location to another location at a specified time. But actually typing out a command/"spell", especially one that does something useful, would take an obscenely long amount of time.

[AshtonPyr]

"Bilutabowase"
My guess for how it's written out:
(AO)ES
Which would (roughly) translate to "All things are in this set"

[TheLuckySpades]

When your colang is secretly naive set theory and functional programming in a trenchcoat

[TotalTimoTime]

this is exactly the intersection of conlangs and esolangs absolutely noone asked for. I love it

[fwics]

I was gonna ask why Bilutabowase doesn't have verbs, but then I realized that if you accurately described a system on the atomic level its behaviour would be completely deterministic and therefore implicit! Great work my man

[LilithNephilim]

dude leaked the source code of the universe

[nickalasmontano]

To be able to even construct the word "I" would take millennia

[GabrielGABFonseca]

I think we might need to add a new item to the list of Crimes Against Humanity.

[ethos]

i think this points out something really interesting about language. you didn't really make your language shorter. what you did was you distilled relationships between objects into a few core ideas. but the outcome was that your language was astronomically long. being able to define custom functions is basically just a cheat to define new words. without calling them words

[aikokazuyuki]

> set of all things
haha you fool. you've fallen into my trap. activate RUSSELL'S PARADOX

[cookiesversuscream]

When Gödel created the proof for his incompleteness theorem, he could have never imagined _this_

[nothingbutlemon]

An animation style made out of character symbols is something I didn't think I needed in my life, I just love this style and the topics of the videos too lol.

[TheMlgNoscoper]

Now translate the video script into this

[The_TinesJathian]

8:40 “3 loaves of garlic bread or three ace of spades playing cards” with the aroace playing card

i see what you did there!

[tzelhael]

I initially thought this wouldn't be that bad... until I realized that, if you want to talk about something, you would need to define every single atom in that object and their position in a specific time that you would also need to define... oh dear.

[JorWat]

It's interesting to contrast this with Ithkuil, which also tries to be completely unambiguous, but goes about it in a completely different way.