UAP 'Identifying the unidentified' Trailer

This a trailer for a 4 part series where Prof Simon speaks to leading experts about UAPs.
Stay Tuned.
Prof Simon.

see this series first on patreon.

[TheChico]

I’m happy to see that you’re coming around to the whole UAP phenomena. Unfortunately, there is so much trash out there regarding it that it makes real events seem ridiculous as well..I believe in the phenomenon but sure hate having to filter through the garbage out there. Without people like Loeb in his position who is really working to get the scientific community to accept the fact that there could actually be things out there that are not man made and should be taken seriously.

[grahamwalker]

It might be that the unidentified objects which are genuinely confirmed as such, are each caused by a different type of phenomena and not necessarily by one source. So it could be that there is still much to learn from investigating each of these intriguing occurrences.

[ramdonko]

Brilliant - back in the game, fun fun fun

[boratsagdiyev]

Awesome stuff, prof Simon. I can’t wait for all to be revealed in your new exciting series.

[jeffrichardson]

Wow, thank you professor Simon! Looking forward to this one

[Customwinder]

Can't wait to find out more about this .

[ghostindamachine]

Hi Prof. Simon, this is super exciting! <3

[SnapcrackerzTeam]

I love this cool cat.... however wish his videos where longer thanks for sharing sir

[Newcenturion]

Good to see new people investigating this. But our history is replete of investigators that have done this for decades and have written many books already.

[vondahe]

The thing is, people will not believe what they are, what they are for and who controls them, if they were told. Whatever you tell them, most will reject and only some accept.

Your only option is to continue calling it a mystery, play esoteric music and leaving the truth to people’s own imagination. Besides, nothing tickles more than a good mystery.

[descamm]

A great subject professor and one that certainly really makes you think quite a lot about what is exactly is out there, let's just hope there friendly and up to date they are.! Thanks professor Simon.

[community-first]

I do hope you make more sense of this more than 99.9% of the World. Why oh why does every expert present this that and the other famous name to suggest they are talking sense. What I like is pure evidence not CGI or assumption. Go for it Prof.

[benjaminsmith]

There is a system of using footage and reports from the public for intelligence gathering about foreign military air capabilities. Probably started around the time of Sputnik, and required actual "Men in black" going around investigating. Now it has probably evolved into a massive operation, likely the size of a major tech company, using the public to crowdsource anomalies in the sky. It's just as interesting to me if the whole thing turns out to be secret military technology.

[themessengertv]

we already the craft and have had people secretly back engineering it for 70 years. imagine what we've been able to build in secret. I'm glad to see people finally accepting the truth, but you guys got alot of catching up to do. Lou elizondo YouTube Interviews are a good start for anyone seeking answers.

[Adam-ysxo]

What are your thoughts on Ross Coulthart's new book, "In Plain Sight"

[robertjohnson]

I thought this channel usually tried to debunk ufos ...it was about time it caught up with the truth 👍

[jeremytravis]

It's great being a Patreon Professor Simon. I wonder how Boris would react if an Unidentified Ariel object landed outside number 10

[InkDropFalls]

fantastic simon ...looking forward to it

Can i suggest Live Stream podcast with an interesting person....just simple conversation about something interesting they do or know about ... ...it could be on any subject to be honest ...it be interesting to see interactions from channel viewers and i al so think it could be popular ....there is shortage of this type content in pod cast or live format

[hatimofficewala]

I am very much keen to meet the outside visitor

[Lehmberg]

Love your stuff, Professor!

No, we won't be talking about those namby-pamby and invalidly respected reconciliations... surrenders to some faithless "fairness" or unearned and bastardized "balance" ...that the concept UAP proves to be. I've discussed this before. Both sides don't.

UFOs and UAPs... Unidentified Flying Object and Unidentified Aerial Phenomena. Does the reader see the difference as highlighted by bold and italic? It produces a telling illustration.

If not, let's go further. Both are unidentified, one can perceive, but that's only the straight-up admission that we don't know, any of us, what the hell we're talking, or thinking, about (a result of not talking... or thinking!) ...in either case! Why... it could even be "magic"... or, "science not yet understood or accepted" is the key point, reader, though that curdles the cockles of the ever-ready "Reducing Cartesians" in the CSIcop crowd!

Then? Then... it gets murky.

Look at "Flying" and "Aerial." Both suggest the airborne, sure, and the difference is subtle. ...But, look closely. The former bespeaks an existential reality perceived of one's senses, in the air, seemingly controlled by extant intelligence, seeable and feelable even if apart from all identification... where clear identification should be able to be made! A zebra, right up close on a clear day at noon? It won't be taken for a horse.

The latter term, aerial; however, takes on an ephemeral even eldritch quality, not quite an admission that there might be something there, but neatly setting us up, anyway, for the third term... its JOB, one can surmise!

"Object" and "Phenomena." There are your tells and bugaboos! The reader has to see the difference, but I'll point it out to the more lumpen like myself. It took me a while!

Object suggests actuality in the real world! It is graspable in one's personal reality tunnel; it is an existentiality of the "here and now" and it has the substance of a brick thrown through a window of a CSI commissary! Phenomena, on the other hand?

Why, a "phenomenon, " FIRST, is a result of mirages, of optical illusions, of misidentified blimps, bolides, and balloons... first, the reader is reminded, according to an "infallible" Occam. Then?

Then, still according to Occam, it can be a result of the confabulatory mechanisms of persons misleading, suppositions of the misled, or the hallucinations of the mentally ill? ...A "phenomenon, " the reader may come to see, that doesn't even have to _be_ there... ...at all!

Anything can be explained away with the rationalization of more "explanation, " reader, embers of reflexive, so toxic and unconstructive doubt can be oxygenated to undeserved life. Like "Jewish Space Lasers"!

Well, ephemera's not the stuff talked about and provoking concern, right? "UFO" is the assertion that there is something there in the here and now, perhaps even something extraterrestrial! UAP, it is offered, is but a "plausible (read: disingenuous!) deniability." It is deniability that there is something there, at all... and it also provides for the ability to more easily mascarade and camouflage the "TRUFOs, " (true UFOs) plainly there at the start... ...as dismissible. Recall the tug of war over McMinnville and Roswell, for example.

UFOs are not UAPs, and vice versa, ok? They are _separate_! They are _distinct_!