Justification: The Beginning of the Gospel | The Baptism of John's Sufferer with Linwood Jackson Jr.

In this episode of Justification, titled we look into what John the Baptist taught and its significance in the context of the Gospel of Mark.

John the Baptist taught a doctrine centered around a sufferer who advances baptism through the Holy Ghost. This powerful vision was used by John to move his audience into a state of repentance. This episode explores the science behind that other baptism..

We investigate how this doctrine fits into the landscape of the period when the gospels were written. This leads us to question the specific era that John the Baptist belonged to. We turn to the opening of the Book of Mark, examining the two quotes that begin this gospel. What do these quotes tell us about the commencement of this new age? When does this transformative era begin, according to Mark's narrative?

By understanding the age John lived in, we gain deeper insights into the nature of Mark's message.

✅ 𝐒𝐓𝐀𝐘 𝐂𝐎𝐍𝐍𝐄𝐂𝐓𝐄𝐃

Donate:👇

Claim YOUR Divi $10 off discount: 👇

The Dawn of Devotion: A Sacrifice for Devotional Evolution: 👇

Knowing Bible:👇

✅ 𝐎𝐓𝐇𝐄𝐑 𝐕𝐈𝐃𝐄𝐎𝐒 𝐘𝐎𝐔 𝐌𝐈𝐆𝐇𝐓 𝐁𝐄 𝐈𝐍𝐓𝐄𝐑𝐄𝐒𝐓𝐄𝐃 𝐈𝐍 𝐖𝐀𝐓𝐂𝐇𝐈𝐍𝐆

Thank you for watching this video, click the "SUBSCRIBE" button to stay connected with this channel.

00:00 - The Baptism
00:54 - Johns Compromised West Wind
03:20 - The Known Belief
11:48 - Heaven's Genuine & Counterfeit Ministry
12:46 - Two Different Verses
18:44 - The Jerusalem Context
23:20 - Perfecting & Reforming Personal Religion
23:58 - Concluding Thoughts

#Justification #JohnTheBaptist #GospelOfMark #HolyGhost #Baptism #BiblicalProphets #TheBeginningOfTheGospel #BibleStudy #ReligiousEducation #Repentance #NewTestament #BiblicalHistory #ChristianDoctrine #SpiritualTransformation #MarkNarrative

𝐓𝐇𝐀𝐍𝐊𝐒 𝐅𝐎𝐑 𝐕𝐈𝐒𝐈𝐓𝐈𝐍𝐆 𝐌𝐘 𝐂𝐇𝐀𝐍𝐍𝐄𝐋
˜”*°•.˜”*°• 𝐋𝐢𝐧𝐰𝐨𝐨𝐝 𝐉𝐚𝐜𝐤𝐬𝐨𝐧 𝐉𝐫 •°*”˜.•°*”

[DavidForester-hcyk]

The more you go through Mark, the more I’m seeing that there’s really more to it, and it doesn’t seem sincere. Fact being why Mark includes those quotes to begin the first chapter and I love that you pointed out the discrepancy from Mark to Malachi. I couldn’t believe how I missed that all these times I’ve read Mark. This is just high quality stuff. Great video

[sambrent]

The John subject has been making me wonder how you stumble onto these little links that create really large ripples. Youve pretty much dismantled the Christian traditional image of John and I believe for good reason. There’s something strange about how, as you are showing, the gospels are piecing their John together. This was a good video. Helpful to breaking through to a real understanding. As I’m seeing Mark is just a large Homer epic in a way

[stevejarnell]

I used to think the book of John was “different, ” but the more you talk about Mark, my opinion is changing, or at least I’m seeing Mark is its own kind of different.

[whitley]

At this point I’m wondering why Mark had to be written so complicated. It’s a story inside of a story.

[chrisaimes]

I have to admit that I’ve been a little skeptical about where this was going, especially since I’m guessing that since Mark doesn’t say Jesus needs to die in order for the Holy Ghost to be released, maybe he doesn’t know. Maybe that’s just something that was added later on. But then you think, if that’s true, then how is the one mightier than him (John) supposed to baptize with the Holy Ghost? Mark never says, so I can see why the confession of John makes sense to add to Mark, that Mark knew only the death of Jesus could release the Holy Ghost.

[joelindsay]

This is pretty wild. The part about the destruction of Jerusalem, being “prophecy, ” then you show that the prophecy was actually given in the first chapter and not as prophecy, but as history, is just so wild to me. This entire book is starting to definitely look like a total and complete mind rape. This is wild stuff. How you get to all of these patterns and just show them, so much clicks. It’s so wild. It’s amazing how many interlocking links are in this. Whoever is writing this, they know something about them, but then when you show how they misquote Malachi, I don’t know if that’s a mistake. That can’t be a mistake. It’s just really wild how they are using scriptures to put a story together and it’s like they’re so careless or don’t care. From the Esther and Daniel thing to the Malachi thing, it’s just wild

[DeMoniMarion-iodt]

I’m literally tripping out over that Malachi/Mark verse. Bruh. I’m tripping right now. My mind is so inside out right now. How the hell could I have never seen that the Malachi verse Mark quotes isn’t even close to the actual Malachi verse. What does that even mean, like, who is Mark talking about then? Because they clearly aren’t talking about what Malachi is talking about. Bruh

[nickcroshe]

So now I’m wondering why Christianity has the Jesus story beginning like 27AD, when Mark positions it at 70AD