What is Article 13 (now Article 17) in the EU Copyright Directive

preview_player
Показать описание
This year the European Union Parliament passed the new Directive on Copyright in the Digital Single Market. This included the infamous Article 13 (which is now Article 17 in the Directive) and Article 11 (a link tax, now Article 15). This monumental new copyright law and its respective processes have to be written and implemented as laws in each member state by Fall 2021. In this video we cover the basics of the EU’s Article 13, the new Directive and its potential impact on the world wide web. This legislation doesn’t just impact Europe but websites and content creators across the world.
► Timestamps:
0:33 What is Article 11 and 13
2:49 My Opinion
3:50 What Kind of Resistance has Article 11 and 13 met?
5:01 What Concerns do we have Concerning Article 13?
7:30 What Should Happen
9:40 Conclusion

► Or call: 1-800-774-2740

OR see below:

Cameras:

Additional Lens:

Mics:

Lights:

Tripods:
Рекомендации по теме
Комментарии
Автор

People : * make the internet free for everyone *

Article 13, net neutrality: let us introduce ourselves

beeiskill
Автор

Article 13 bill: *passes*
Europe one day later:

BRAKING NEWS🔴EUROPEAN POPULATION DROPS TO 0%

mc-ate-bit
Автор

I went trough summary and most important points of the article 17 about a year ago, can't honestly remember much about that anymore. But what I do remember it's not that bad, and actually in some respects it protects both publishers and content creators. Link tax and meme thing is totally false, also fair use is still a thing. "Link tax" or whatnot was directed at platfroms like facebook to limit how much they show about news article, I mean people wouldn't need to go to news site if you could read all the most important things just from preview(Preview of article when you paste an link on site like fb). It doesn't restrict use or posting of links at all. There's also clause that directly protects parody and comedy.
Also there's no obligation for scanning content before it's uploaded, YouTube already does this btw. It just dictates how copyright claims have to be dealt with.
Article 17 is framework for EU countries to work in. For end users pretty much nothing will change. It's meant to make rules clearer and protect copyright owners.
People have much more to worry about platfrom's own rules, YouTube being prime example.

mukkaar
Автор

What about this: exceptions:
a) quotation, criticism, review;
b) use for the purpose of caricature, parody or pastiche.”

"and a number of procedural safeguards intended to ensure that users can exercise the rights they have under these exceptions and limitations".

What does that mean for gameplay, educational content, react videos etc?

sarahmardini
Автор

What if a country straight up denies to implement it ?

mr.p
Автор

The entire internet is going to die in a few days...

dootrevenant
Автор

has it passed or will it happen by 2020?

ILoveMylarBalloonsForever
Автор

in a few months this will be passed. what'll happen next?

lutriss
Автор

2 ways or more in replies to not be attacked by article 17

1. Original stuff
2. Giving credits to real people who originally made it

ajokewdym
Автор

Yes I want to get a fucking license just to post a dumb meme on reddit. Thanks EU.

cacomelon