Pythagorean theorem proof by scaling

preview_player
Показать описание
This is a short, animated visual proof of the Pythagorean theorem (the right triangle theorem) using the hypotenuses of scaled triangles. This theorem states the square of the hypotenuse of a right triangle is equal to the sum of squares of the two other side lengths. #mathshorts #mathvideo #math #pythagoreantheorem #pythagorean #triangle #manim #animation #theorem #pww #proofwithoutwords #visualproof #proof

To learn more about animating with manim, check out:
Рекомендации по теме
Комментарии
Автор

Wow! Never seen this proof before. Very original! ❤👍😊

richardgratton
Автор

The best visual proof I've seen so far. Tomorrow I'll show to my mates

samueleprandini
Автор

Geometry really does make more sense when you try to draw it.

bujamade
Автор

I saw the proof with squares attached to each edge and the areas were added, but this is so much cleaner. Easy to remember too, scale by each edge. Ty!

jickhertz
Автор

This is a completely different proof than I've ever seen, amazing

IbadassI
Автор

This is certainly an interesting proof. I've seen the one that shows the areas of a^2 added to b^2 yielding the area c^2.

SerunaXI
Автор

Truly surprising and ingenious this unusual graphic demonstration of the Pythagorean theorem. Congratulations

vladimirrodriguez
Автор

Way better than those 30 minutes of lectures, ty.

Jb_loL
Автор

Ur channel is so underrated
Great work 💪

ambigousamphibian
Автор

Very cool visual proof. Never seen it before 👍

wwjjss
Автор

I thought he was going to say the hypotenuse had a length of *P* for a second. That's a relief.

diegodankquixote-wry
Автор

Hmm, I discovered an equivalent proof a few years ago. It's really nice.

juandiegoparales
Автор

First time i’ve ever seen this proof before. Probably the best one I’ve seen too

ceebad
Автор

Ima do the math nerd, but, the pythagorean theorem is no theorem actualy it is a special thing with an other theorem (idk how it is exactly but you'll understand) in fact in a triangle you can calculate any side with a *simple* theorem: (c^2)=(a^2)+(eather cos or sin of the angle AB (which here is 90°)+(b^2) and in fact eather the cos or sin of 90 is *zero* so you get this: (c^2)=(a^2)+(b^2)
(Sorry if this is impossible to undestand, english is not my 1st langages)

kyliann
Автор

I think even better if one flipped the last triangle (factor c) so that the final composite (of 3 triangles) forms a rectangle

stephenlugemwaluswata
Автор

Actually this theorem was proves many decades before pythagora . This theorem but with different derivation is written by baudhayana sabal Sutra |

tillexplaning
Автор

Thanks it's actually very interesting to know about these things

RandeepS.
Автор

I've never seen this proof before, and now it's my favorite.

Astronomator
Автор

Euclid, or rather the euclidian school, did not accept reflection in their proofs. Why, you may ask? Because they had to use the axioms stated at the beginning of Elements - there are 13 axioms. Should reflection have been added as an axiom? Since it seems not to be necessary they felt not. Challenge: find a plane geometry problem where it is necessary or provide a proof that reflection is never needed.

joeremus