'An extraordinary collapse': What Andrea Mitchell saw inside the courtroom at Trump's trial

preview_player
Показать описание
Andrea Mitchell joined Katy Tur and Chris Jansing to share some color on what it was like inside the courtroom this morning and detail Robert Costello’s testimony in former President Trump’s hush money trial.



Follow MSNBC Show Blogs

MSNBC delivers breaking news, in-depth analysis of politics headlines, as well as commentary and informed perspectives. Find video clips and segments from The Rachel Maddow Show, Morning Joe, The Beat with Ari Melber, Deadline: White House, The ReidOut, All In, Last Word, 11th Hour, and Alex Wagner who brings her breadth of reporting experience to MSNBC primetime. Watch “Alex Wagner Tonight” Tuesday through Friday at 9pm Eastern.

Connect with MSNBC Online

'An extraordinary collapse': What Andrea Mitchell saw inside the courtroom at Trump's trial

#Trial #Trump #HushMoney
Рекомендации по теме
Комментарии
Автор

Andrea Mitchell seems to be having a hard time getting the words out, to the point where it's hard to understand what she's trying to say

karaDee
Автор

No soap opera in the world, now or ever, comes close to this. Hollywood couldn’t even make this crap up with all their imaginations! 😳

kgraham
Автор

Wow so extraordinary I can't believe the blatant truth is coming to light

Donovan-vj
Автор

Wow, and Costello was a defense witness?? That was stupid, didn't they know the prosecution had those emails??

catznjam
Автор

What is up with Andrea Mitchell? She seems really off and unable to speak clearly and in a normal cadence.

dpscarlett
Автор

“ you have friends in high places” . How corrupt are these guys .

ishbhad
Автор

How does one trial take 4 years, for nothing to go to the supreme court, that he appointed!

carlturner
Автор

😮 all I can say is ouch. And Trump forced his lawyers to put this nut job on the stand.
There's a point in the game where every lawyer should simply tell the client who's in charge here .

wmduke
Автор

The problem for Trump's lawyer's: It's very difficult to defend the indefensible.

MKZ-lwns
Автор

This is the most incoherent description of the court I've seen in years. This case is disintegrating in front of everyone, and Andrea is so shaken she can't even describe it.

stephensmith
Автор

As usual, people’s stupid comments reflect that they are missing the whole point of the story. Why?

karoltowns
Автор

What Andrea is saying is really hard to follow. She's not really "reporting" what happened. She editorializes a lot and doesn't really give any solid information.

sharondunn
Автор

A sincere pat on the back of the Orange Turds defense team for letting Mr Costello do such an exquisite job of sticking the knife in the back of their client. You just can’t make this stuff up….. 👍🏻💙🍺😂

topcattruffles
Автор

I think this reporter has a speech problem, she seemed really nervous, at a loss for words, and tongue tied. She did give accurate information though and portrayed a good picture of what happened in the courtroom today.

JohnDoe-fuqd
Автор

This is a terrible report wasn’t she ready for the crossing?😔

Eddie-tnom
Автор

Is anyone in @nbcnews watching Andrea Mitchell's on camera performance over the past several months. She is constantly struggling to get the words out. She has had a distinguished career, but it is now time to recognize that it is time to step aside.

EdwardBartel
Автор

Andrea Mitchell, while I do have respect for her long career, is no longer cut out for this. It was hard for her to even convey a simple message.

brian
Автор

it's always refreshing when a privileged old man stumbles over his own self-righteousness.

msaar
Автор

And just think, this is the least criminal trial of trump. The other two are far more important due to major crimes against the country.

TexasCat
Автор

I pray for an orange jump suit BUT, do NOT try to second guess a jury. I WILL say, after being on five juries, that, at least my experience, was that everyone in that room too the case totally seriously, we went over the evidence, discussed parts of it when necessary and came up with a verdict. What seem obvious to us may NOT be so obvious to every juror there. THEY have no heard any analysis we have, and people are people and we DO all have biases. There ARE, supposedly, a couple of attorneys on the jury and I can't say if that's a good or bad thing.

pamelawing