Supreme Court 6-3 Decision Changes Second Amendment Fight Forever! Expansion & Enforcement Sought!

preview_player
Показать описание
In this video I break down a critical case dealing with ammunition restrictions that is now back in front of the Supreme Court!

🎥 Follow Me On Other Social Media 🎥

📷 My YouTube Setup 📷

Legal Disclaimer: This content is not intended to provide any legal guidance or advice. Although I am a licensed attorney I am not providing any legal advice through this video. If you have any legal questions please contact a licensed professional in your area to address your specific issues.

DISCLAIMER: This video and description contains affiliate links, which means that if you click on one of the product links, I’ll receive a small commission. This helps support my channel and allows us to continue making awesome videos like this. Thank you for the support!
Рекомендации по теме
Комментарии
Автор

Support the channel by liking and subscribing!

ArmedScholar
Автор

There are insufficient means to hold judges accountable for corruption. Activist judges should be locked up for human rights violations.

kevinh
Автор

There is no justification for taking away individuals' freedom in the guise of public safety. << Thomas Jefferson
CA's "Roster of Firearm Safety list" needs to

Toadyru
Автор

Supreme court should put a end to IRS purchasing millions of dollars of ammo and fully automatic rifles as well.

seriouscyrus
Автор

There is no way, when the Constitution was first ratified, that any state required a gun owner to register his gun.

davegaetano
Автор

The second amendment was written for times like these.

B.O.A.Z
Автор

I can’t keep these laws straight anymore which I assume is exactly their goal.

amryan
Автор

It’s bewildering how all these anti-2A lawmakers who are presumedly well-practiced in words and phrasing, as required for their profession, can’t seem to comprehend “shall not be infringed”.

MrLoganr
Автор

It's Treason to do these things attacking the 2nd Amendment in anyway shape or form. Rather by the Firearms or Accessories or Ammunition...

thomasbarrett
Автор

Once again, CA and NY don't care. This includes the 9th circuit. They consider the constitution as a privilege subject to their interpertation instead of a right that is given to you as an US citizen.

benashbaugh
Автор

Will these rulings be enforced on NY?`Kathy Hochul has to be held accountable for violating the laws..

tnhkzmfreedom
Автор

Not only is it mandatory to do a background check on ammo, then NY makes me pay a fee to do the check which they say is mandatory. Can’t make this shit up.

BladesRKing
Автор

Crazy how i don't need a permit to access any of my other constitutional rights.

wearblackclothes
Автор

Thanks from Syracuse NewYork, ,, vote Hochul OUT ! ..TRUMP 2024

chrisnester
Автор

Here we go!!! Love you Armed Scholar!!! Your awesome!

andrewcowie
Автор

The Supreme Court has not done one damn thing to uphold the 2A since bruin. Absolutely disgusting!! When will they be held accountable?!!

seandoherty
Автор

Is there any doubt that lawyers are responsible for our legal system being so fucked up?

Richard-sdt
Автор

I would like to remind you all that if a background check for ammunition is unconstitutional a background check for a gun is unconstitutional. No difference. We will see how this goes.

voteholyk
Автор

The Second Amendment clearly states that it should not be changed or altered in any shape or form

dinosabatelllo
Автор

Thank you for keeping us updated on constitutional legal cases. As always, good job.

lyndawest