Supreme Court 6-3 Decision Changes Second Amendment Suppressor Laws Forever! 5th Cir. Weighs Impact!

A critical lawsuit is now in the 5th Circuit challenging Suppressor laws as a violation of the Second Amendment!

🎥 Follow Me On Other Social Media 🎥

📷 My YouTube Setup 📷

Legal Disclaimer: This content is not intended to provide any legal guidance or advice. Although I am a licensed attorney I am not providing any legal advice through this video. If you have any legal questions please contact a licensed professional in your area to address your specific issues.

DISCLAIMER: This video and description contains affiliate links, which means that if you click on one of the product links, I’ll receive a small commission. This helps support my channel and allows us to continue making awesome videos like this. Thank you for the support!

[darrenvanderwilt]

So, if suppressors are not firearms, then why do they have to be licensed, serialized, and registered like firearms or a “dangerous” devises? My patience with these mental gymnastics is wearing thin.

[SysterEuropa]

The ATF fears that one day SCOTUS will expose the NFA as a Constitutional enigma....as it truly is.

[dangerousliberty]

A tax, registration or fee on a right is unconstitutional . How many people register their right to free speech?🤔

[Null_Null_Null]

Wake me up when I can buy a silencer without going thru unconstitutional processes.

[AllAboutSurvival]

The 2A clearly states 'shall not be infringed, ' and it's time we recognize that applies to all arms, including suppressors.

[ReaIHuman]

Imagine regulating a safety device, which it's sole reason of existing is to protect your hearing.

[douglashewitt]

The NFA and ATF can't have it both ways: either suppressors ARE or ARE NOT firearms! The courts just choose which way they want to go. Not a firearm means no 2A protection, but they can't later say it is and act like it is a felony under NFA.

[rettwolff]

Hello Counselor,

Thank you for your valuable hardwork and research of the subject.
We appreciate the citations and facts of the case presented.
We wish you success and the best of everything.
More power to the Channel.

Long it may wave...
GOD Bless the USA.

Kind regards here in Corona Del Mar, CA.

[douglashewitt]

Suppressors are not dangerous. A bullet can't be fired by one nor does it have a receiver, which is a firearm. Carrying a suppressor alone in your coat pocket in no way is dangerous or unusual. They are going way too far to intimidate lawful citizens.

[FlyEaglesFly]

Anthony Thank you for all you do! Stay safe and be well. God bless

[ToddKing]

Fifty, FIFTY, officers to serve a search warrant. At someone's home. This is what a police state looks like.

[freedom_seed.x]

This man needs proper legal counsel. Where is GOA or FPC? This is exactly the kind of case that they should take.

[sunsetz]

This needs to be over already. They need to stop unnecessarily regulating everything.

[ZomPaul]

Atf permission should not be required for hushtubes period

[ChristopherCox-zjdr]

Greetings from PA thanks for keeping us in the know

[AlphaArmor]

Since when is it okay for one man to tell another man what he can do, own, or create?!

[utyfv]

this is deliberate by the defense attorney as he is anti gun and does not gaf about the 2nd amendment. why else would he be using outdated arguments and non sequiturs.

[foryourspirit]

Your voice sounds great, very relaxed, open and clear sir! Well done!

[rolandesquivel]

Good breakdown of an important subject

[chrisb]

The ATF has been quite successful arguing both a) they can regulate firearms because they have been empowered to do so, and b) they can regulate non-firearms since they aren't protected by the second amendment.