Einstein's Quantum Riddle! PBS NOVA at UCSD Clarke Center

Join this channel to get access to perks:

📺 Watch my most popular videos:📺

Follow me to ask questions of my guests:

-~-~~-~~~-~~-~-
Please watch: "Neil DeGrasse Tyson: Plays the Race Card!"
-~-~~-~~~-~~-~-

[bentationfunkiloglio]

So glad you decided to share this video on your channel. Really enjoyed it.

[_John_Sean_Walker]

Great that we have the Arthur C. Clarke Center.

[johnhearn]

Entagelment can be proven by observing the interaction of a one meter smartphone charging cable with Schördinger's cat.

[Corvaire]

Loving every one of these questions by the audience.
Great job folks! ;O)-

[MS-odje]

3. Freedom is not entirely free.
This is what the Mandelbrot set says.
You are limited in choice. You in fact have no choice but to choose. The logistics map as the “real” number line of the Mandelbrot set is least chaotic in the same region where the complex plane is most chaotic. The opposite is also true.

Consider then bells Theorem and freedom.

[xemdutup]

I told PBS about the discovery of the Universal Alphabetic Law of Nature 2018
"What is a law of Nature" ???

[vanikaghajanyan]

37:55 Happy Birthday Albert Einstein!
P.S.
"It can be convincingly proved that reality cannot be represented by a continuous field at all. It seems to follow from quantum phenomena that a finite system with finite energy can be completely described by a finite set of numbers - quantum numbers... A purely algebraic theory is required to describe reality." (Einstein, January, 1955).

[coldlogiccrusader]

As for practical applications of QM, I was astounded to learn that a Medical PET scan is an acronym for POSITRON Emission Tomography. My God, we now are using Anti-Matter as a very practical Medical Diagnostic tool. Anti-Matter is no longer confined to Particle Accelerators who'ed of thunk

[ahmedbensebti]

I enjoyed this video about this amazing astronomical experiment vindicating the mysterious phenomena called entanglement.

[vanikaghajanyan]

39:10 Quantum mechanics uses a model of space in common with other fundamental theories: space is continuous, homogeneous, isotropic, Euclidean, time is continuous and homogeneous. The reference frame in quantum theory is inertial. The parameters included in the Schrodinger equation and the relations resulting from it are found experimentally and have certain values: here we should focus on the coordinates of a point in space and a moment in time, which are the arguments of the state function. 
It is also known that quantum theory is closely friends with SRT:
"So, Einstein's special theory of relativity does not finally break with Newtonian absolute space… In a sense, this theory brings all physics, including electrodynamics, to the state in which mechanics has been since the time of Newton."(Max Born, RT, chapter VII, paragraph 11, the last fragment).
Now a natural question arises: in general, what kind of quantum description of reality is being discussed according to quantum theory, when, according to quantum mechanics, the course of a separate quantum transition (in other words, a "jump") in time is a random phenomenon; and at what point each transition occurred, it is not possible to calculate using quantum mechanics, although it is generally accepted, that the transition occurs as a result of the evolution of the system over a finite period of time? When smearing everything (and everyone?) this theory is called "quantum"?
P.P.S. To the topic: why do you need two quasars (in general, two particles) when the Big Bang can be "used" as an entanglement of all particles in the universe. And?

[Ihab.A]

Watching from the beginning, maybe my question is already answered in the video, but when is the PBC NOVA documentary going to be published?

[nightwaves]

Take the time to figure the impulses transmitted through the plasma and figure part of what toys with you is like hearing a twin jets impulses in sound wavering and setting their own distant impulse that isn't the same as eithers original impulses. Take to mind that stars have major impulses in many forms transmitted into plasma.

[zdayz]

Bell demands you count the objects and is flawed in the assumption that THAT is how events happen.
1) I don't think quantum is as 'quantized' and distinct packet-ized as we assume... when they are emitted they are surely at a certain level, but using filters just makes the waves attenuated; apparently space itself doesn't care how much of a photon it carries per second.... if you have a laser, and use a thick stack of filters that block 60% of the light each, eventually you should get back to single photon events, but you still end up with a continuous wave that interferes with itself.
1a) then maybe photo multipliers/camera sensors can gain small amounts of energy over time, and then respond that a thing is there... and it's a change in (?generically I'd call it state; but state also means spin state, and i mean just a cumulated effect of change over time) over time...
2) maybe polarized filters don't block 100% of the photon or 0%, but rather only chop one part of the polarization - if the 'slits' are horizontal, then the vertical component is chopped and whatever fraction remains goes through the filter. An accumulation of partial photons over time (say double the time since it's approx. 1/2)...
3) maybe the math required for a LHV test is wrong, I can play the CHSH game with a seeded PRNG and you have free choice over your observations; and I can certainly beat quantum physics.... but then I'm using a ratio of 1-x/(2-x) ... (A+B=2C; a=A/C; b=B/C; a+b=2; b=2-a; 1-a/b = 0 or b/a-1=0 (depending if a or b is larger), and a=x. because I'm actually on a line with 2 parts (2L+x) and (2L-x) and comparing the ratios... it's very much like the time dilation in special relativity actually.
if you require that a thing be a head or tail, known by the particle then it can only be those two things... but if you say it has a number, and when it gets to the other end you have a number of boxes of total possible numbers it could be, arranged in any order you want (free choice), you put the particle into its numbered box, and see what its state is... it's not that the particle was already a left or right handed glove, you don't know until you 'redeem the token' in a box and get the result.
Then when you count how many events end up with boxes that are a certain way, you should apply the ratio of this to the ratio of misses not the total count of events...
(Happy birthday to Einstein (and me) ! and happy Pi Day ! )

[notanemoprog]

It's determinism all the way down

[NotMyGumDropButtons.]

Quantum riddle ? who cares What about Crom's Riddle of Steel?

[kimmono]

In the description of the video, you only add general information and not specific things about the questions discussed in a video?

[suyapajimenez]

Name of the documentary and where is going to play

[sakismpalatsias]

I'm curious if ER=EPR. What prevents FTL communication if the perspective of the particulars, to themselves, are right beside each other while to our perspective they may seem apart. I don't think Space-time cares about our perspective but the particles. It's just an illusion of FTL

[veganwinter]

Historically we've been warned of the vital and detectable difference between raw corn (food) and cooked! (Szekely, Ed. B. Essene Gospel of Peace)

[MS-odje]

Thanks for the freedom … pushing this idea