percy jackson new vs old official art

preview_player
Показать описание

Рекомендации по теме
Комментарии
Автор

Lol I remember BEFORE Viria's art was official, and the fandom collectively was like "yeah, this is the canon art"

lillianmanuel
Автор

the og percy jackson art is the reason why im in therapy

danny_
Автор

Bro, Nico looks like a gremlin in the old art

diychef
Автор

I don't know anything about Percy Jackson but the old artwork has that typical charm of teen literature cover artwork from the times when I was still a teen.

Grey_Warden_Invasion
Автор

I don't think the old art is bad, it just serves a different purpose. The old one is what I expect in a kids novel and the new one is what I expect when I search fanart to see the handsome version of the characters lol

HiankoWillem
Автор

everyone in the comments talking about the artists is missing a lot of context. basically for the old art Rick Riordan commissioned an artist who specialized in drawing monsters, not people, so while they did they best they could they honestly didn’t do too well simply because this wasn’t what they were used to drawing— and if you see the rest of the book the monsters were indeed illustrated spectacularly. the newer official artworks were actually originally fanarts that Riordan liked so much that he made them official. while I prefer the newer ones too its good to understand why the older ones looked so “bad”.

pumkinpatchwork
Автор

I had Viria's work (the new official artist) as my personal headcannons for them YEARS before it was made official and goddam did I feel vindicated

ermagerd
Автор

im fairly certain the “new” illustrations were originally fanart, but were accepted as canon by most of the fandom

darth-milk
Автор

Can you imagen being such a great fan artist that people pick your art over the official art every. Single. Time.

GolldenVallion
Автор

The old art was at the start of the series, when they were younger and more awkward (as we all are at the start.) The new art shows them more developed, physically of course as they grew, but they were naturally more fleshed out by adventures as more complex people over the years.

sealswimswim
Автор

The artist were on crack when they drew these

senatusthegreatest
Автор

They all look age appropriate in the old art as they're first depicted in the stories. The new art looks like they could maybe be 16 or 18.

WhiteWolfTechGaming
Автор

The old ones make me cry. Like I literally have tears running down my face

A.C.
Автор

Comment section is not it.

Dont bring down artists.

Thist just shows what artstyle appealed more in different eras. They catered the new art for todays media.

And the old one was for that time.

A lot of older books also had a similar artstyle.

Akipoutark
Автор

Why tf does Luke look like an anime protagonist tho…

AddiAndTheDogs
Автор

i was a fan of the new artist way back in the day. love to see their work get recognized! let’s try not to hate on the old artist tho, they tried their best and honestly some of the portraits are super cute with a lot of life behind them! i like annabeth’s the most.

tsuki
Автор

PLEASE TELL ME THE SECOND ONE WAS NOT NICO! NO! They did them all SO dirty at first.

andreamay
Автор

You guys remember how the old art they were all 13-14?

jakupsundoe
Автор

I like the old art. It reminds me of school libraries or kids' books, and it's very stylized. The new art may be an upgrade, but I think the old art is also good.

Niamhrlgz
Автор

Pls the fandom just collectively disowned the official art and rolled with Viria’s designs instead 😭 I remember seeing her art up on the wiki LONG before it was even declared canon JSNDBF

axelf
visit shbcf.ru