Why I DON'T like Claude 3 Opus + GPT-4o comparison

preview_player
Показать описание


Let's compare Claude 3 Opus vs GPT-4o for a variety of text generation tasks.
Рекомендации по теме
Комментарии
Автор

Try it again with the new Sonnet 3.5 am very curious

AhmedVonKabs
Автор

Yup. I used Claude for a while and it burned through $25 in a couple of hours…. and the only way to use it in Canada was through the api. It is also heavily censored. I don’t use it anymore. I sure like perplexity but don’t have the paid plan. It would be great to have a bot in MyAIAgent that scraps the news in my niche and creates articles for LinkedIn with references and an image using mid journey. 😊

I totally agree that it’s not a bad thing to produce AI content.

I have experimented with different AI writing detectors. I ran an article through three different detectors. One said it was AI. The second said it was written by a human. The third said it was 50:50. 😂. Totally useless.

Excellent analysis Wes. Hats off to you 👑

CM-zljw
Автор

Claude 3 Opus makes my blog sounds more human. The tone is more natural and doesn't use big and complicated words like ChatGPT 4. However, when I tell it to blend various keywords into the article it totally messes up. Claude also seems to be a bit wordy in its explanation. While ChatGPT like to break content down into bullet points and follows my prompts correctly.

easyislander
Автор

Llama is free and it does not seem like anyone is talking about it. Wes, will you test Llama and maybe add this model to YourAIagent software?

rapidprofits
Автор

I totally agree with you! We've seen the same results and generally avoid Claude since Omin came along. Keep up the great videos.

docdanoderm
Автор

I did like it at first, but then it became censored. It was not at first, now I have moved away from it.

theegamerdotcom