Complete Destruction | Russia Escalates Offensive Operations

preview_player
Показать описание

PAYPAL DONATIONS:

Thanks for watching! And have a great day! :D

Disclaimer: If you are sensitive to the topics of this channel or get triggered by the contents of my videos I advice you to not watch my channel and avoid the subject all-together.
Рекомендации по теме
Комментарии
Автор

I'll play CIA's game. Supposing their 87% figures is accurate, this just means that Russia was able to complete rebuild its entire army from scratch into one that is two to three times bigger than its original size within little more than two years. And this army, armed with little more than shovels - another thing Western intelligence told us so it must be true - is holding back a Ukrainian army outfitted with the best of NATO's toys, including Abrams, Leopards, Challengers, HIMARS, ATACMS and more. And Russia did it with an economy 1/10th the size of NATO's member states.

Russia's respawn ability is overpowered. No wonder the West is anxious.

TheNascentLight
Автор

Funny how many of us, including you Weeb, predicted this from day 1

flyingpharoah
Автор

if the Russian lost that amount of troops and equipment, then why did Zelensky still asking for more aid?

RickyRisnandar
Автор

The figures are meant for US Congress and US public showing them Ukraine is winning they just need another 100 billions

azmalkhan
Автор

If Russia fires 10 times more artillery, and 75% of casualties come from artillery fire. Then Ukraine must have suffered at least 5-10 times more casualties than Russia, if you think Russia misses more often, which it actually does not. These are facts of war

davidlloyd
Автор

It’s slow but steady progress. This is not ww2. Putin is not Stalin. He is careful with the lives of his soldiers. People expect a 2 million man offensive, otherwise they say Russia is weak

MoviesvsReality
Автор

In the world of quantum physics things can appear from nothing or disappear into nothing.. Probably this is how they made their maths.

andrejprebil
Автор

You are misunderstanding the statement regarding the loss of 87% strength. The statement is that of the original force, your figure of 45, 000 personnel would be ignoring the new forces raised therefore the statement suggests that 45, 000 troops in addition to all mobilized personnel hold the entirety of the frontline still over 300k assuming absolutely 0 casualties of the mobilized personnel. All of that being said it’s an absolutely absurd statement to be made there’s no way 87% of the Russian military was destroyed in Ukraine. And there’s no way the United States government can tell the truth, the US government couldn’t find its ass in the dark with a flashlight, compass, and written instructions.

johndunaj
Автор

So much Russia winning alone while the EU and Nato lose together.

GeoPoliticsCommentry
Автор

Appreciating you taking time to continue informing people like me since following you since February 2022. Job well done so far❤

Tomhawk
Автор

It is pretty disingenuous to count casualties without distinguishing between KIA, WIA permanent disability and WIA with recuperation and return to battle. Drpending on the mix, you could have the same 350, 000 casualties with very different consequences for Russia's strength. Shoigu once said IIRC that 90 percent of their WIA are able to return to fight. Even if the true number is 70 percent, and taking 70k as the KIA count it still means that 200, 000 of those 350, 000 casualties can recover and rejoin the battle. Ukraine otoh has very high KIA and lost limb WIA due to bad medical evacuation and treatment.

torpedospurs
Автор

"I felt a great tremor on the West. It was as though a million Ukrainotards cried out in horror and were suddenly silenced."

- Obi Wan

instasis
Автор

HAHAHA CNN.. That's not even a legitimate news outlet. It's more like Teletubbies for adults.

Arminiuswolfspeer
Автор

"About 244, 000 reservists are currently in the conflict zone, in addition to contract troops and volunteers, the Russian President has said" just posted by RT

sowianskizonierz
Автор

How do we get such headlines? Like this:

"The [Tet] offensive had a strong effect on the U.S. government and shocked the U.S. public, which had been led to believe by its political and military leaders that the North Vietnamese were being defeated and incapable of launching such an ambitious military operation..."

garethmartin
Автор

If Russia has only 45, 000 troops why can't Ukraine beat them?

christianalvarez
Автор

It's not a coincidence that these withdrawals are occurring at the same time as Mr. Z's begging spree in the US.

pratahsinnetamby
Автор

Are the intelligence analysts who say 87% has been lost of the same quality as the ones that said the Hunter laptop was fake?

RN
Автор

Putin calls Zelensky regime ‘freeloaders’ 😂

mickg
Автор

I have noticed thru this war not once was a troop convoy being intercepted. Yet we hear of Brigades being transfered all over the front. I find this very odd

rogerboniface