How can converting PCM to DSD be better?

preview_player
Показать описание

I am getting close to publishing my memoir! It's called 99% True and it is chock full of adventures, debauchery, struggles, heartwarming stories, triumphs and failures, great belly laughs, and a peek inside the high-end audio industry you've never known before.

Рекомендации по теме
Комментарии
Автор

I have a CD from a Metal band called Accept - Staying a Life, it shows on the Japanese liner that it is mastered in DSD. This CD is the best sounding CD I have ever heard, You can crank the music and it seems like it just doesn't fatigue my ears, distortion seems really hard to introduce...Also, the left and right channels are really defined and extremely clear...I can play this CD on a basic sound system in my car and it still sounds really good.

darinsteele
Автор

Here's a very brief engineering explanation: In PCM, you are encoding (the "C" for code) an analog wave into a math function (generally speaking, a "Delta-Sigma" Modulation, the "M".) That code is then flashed at a clock cycle across a medium, much like Morse code (hence the Pulse.) This is received and decoded on the other end, where the wave is regenerated by inverting the math function from the previous end. Alternately, in PDM, instead of using math to encode the wave into an equation, the modulation operation is a bit different. For PDM to work, you need a clock cycle like PCM, but instead of an agreed-upon math function, we get to leverage an implicit property of nature found in calculus called an Integral. This is the idea that a series of discrete points can be used to define a smooth curve. Now, instead of pulsing a Morse code, you're playing Flappy Bird. Each flash will represent an impluse, and this will boost the signal level. This blip will then decay. If you pulse it again, it'll raise it up a little more, and it'll decay a little more, just like tapping the screen in Flappy Bird makes it bolt up, then drop down, then bolt up and then drop down. If your clock speed is fast enough, and your impulse and decay rate are calibrated correctly, it will trace out an extremely accurate wave form, though it will be "stippled, " much like an inkjet printer. If you apply a smoothing capacitor, you will have a pure analog wave. Interestingly, this is very similar to the technology used to make Class D power supplies. (PWM or Pulse WIDTH Modulation uses how LONG to pulse for, not how MANY pulses.)

mr.bennett
Автор

Nice pictures from Portugal in the background ;)

PedroContente
Автор

Thanks, this is very true. You can hear the difference. The only digital conversion i can think of that improves the output quality.

OGmolton
Автор

I convert all PCM to DSD 64 with my LUMIN U1 Mini and the difference in sound coming out of the DAC is incredible!

luisrodrigonunezolguin
Автор

I would really like to hear my mic pre's through DSD. As an engineer who grew up with Neve, SSL and even DDA pre's, I have some issues with the PCM conversion in my current setup even with the Midas equipment. Would be cool if PS Audio could make a recording interface that supported DSD.

royferntorp
Автор

First example
Suppose a 4 bit PCM-signal (4 bits per sample). 4 bits has 16 values (0-15). You can convert that to 16 samples in DSD (16 samples of 1 bit per sample). The value 12 converts to 12 ones (and 4 zero’s) (and you can convert it back by counting the ones). That requires a 4 times higher bit rate (16 bits in stead of 4).

Second example
Suppose a 16 bit PCM-signal (16 bits per sample). 16 bits has possible 65.536 values. You can convert one PCM sample to 65.536 samples in DSD (65.536 samples of 1 bit per sample). And that requires a 65.520 times (65.536 - 16) higher bit rate. So you can convert lossless a 16 bit at 44100 Hz PCM-stream to a 2.890.137.600 Hz DSD-stream (that is 2890 MHz).

Third example
Suppose a 24 bit PCM-signal (24 bits per sample). 24 bits has possible 16.777.216 values. You can convert one PCM sample to 16.777.216 samples in DSD (16.777.216 samples of 1 bit per sample). And that requires a 16.777.192 times (16.777.216 - 24) higher bit rate. So you can convert lossless a 24 bit at 176.400 Hz PCM-stream to a 2.959.500.902.400 Hz DSD-stream (that is 2.959.500 MHz or 2.959 GHz or almost 3 THz).

Fourth example
The other way around. Suppose a DSD-signal (64 times the sample rate of a CD). 64 pulses you can code with 7 bits. You can convert a DSD signal to a 7 bit at 44100 Hz PCM signal (just count the pulses).

Conversion from PCM to DSD and back can be done lossless (as shown). But it requires very large sample rates and very large bitrates in DSD format. So, in my opinion you better use PCM as a format and convert to DSD in hardware, in the DAC. And I think this is what most DAC’s do: converting a high resolution / low sample rate to a low resolution / high sample rate. And because the needed sample rate are too high the DAC’s convert it to a 4 bit signal in stead of a 1 bit signal. So, in my opinion, use PCM and let the DAC do the conversion (with the current DSD sample rates).

JerryRutten
Автор

what is the best wv to DSD converter? my music sound dull/flat when converted from .WV (wave) to DSD & the bass completely disappears

Me-kseu
Автор

DCS Audio discovered this back in the early 90s and knew it was the future of digital audio. No manufacture at the time made a dac that could handle it so they made their own convert chips specifically to work with DSD which they still use today

IIn 98 they came out with the Elgar converter and Purcell upsampler that took all rates and converted them to DSD. They sold this dac for 10 years before replacing it. In my opinion they still sound better than most new equipment and still sell for over 3, 000$ for a 20 year old digital source on the used market Better still, DCS will still service and repair them. Not many companies can say that about their digital devices

stephensr
Автор

An interesting article, thanks Paul. I'm going through my record collection and digitizing with a view to converting to DSD128. Would it be best to capture at 176.4kHz because that is an integer multiple of DSD128 sampling frequency? Would there be any advantage/disadvantage in making the original capture at 192kHz, which is the highest rate my ADC will do?

johnspink
Автор

Great great question. But you didn’t actually answer it! We understand DSD is more true to life, but why converting PCM to DSD which your products do, is not explained in your answer. I use Roon to do this and it clearly sounds better and the sound stage is wider and the sound is more real.

goldenears
Автор

new to all this Hires DSD discution...
I was able to get a protable DAM/AMP decent enough for day to day listening (Fiio Q1 Mark II).
Looking at your video I decide to look at ways to make mi Windows use my DAC in ASIO DSD256 as output.

End up using the chain:
1. HIFI-Cable & ASIO Bridge (windows sound to ASIO proxy)
2. ASIO PRoxy setup to output all samplerates to DSD256 in DSD mode
3. Use Fiio ASIO driver to connect my device and sent DSD bitsteam to the DAC.

This wal all your windows audio will be sent as DSD bitstream to the DAC, no need to convert or transcode anything; and cloud services like deezer, youtuve, tidal, soundcloud will be sent as DSD stream.
the only BUT is latency added by the buffers in the diferent steps; this solution needs tunning if you where to use it in gaming for example.

balamacab
Автор

After hearing Paul talk about DSD I got my hands on some music


WOW..!! They sound amazing, I'm now an instant DSD convert..!!

Jules-lwtl
Автор

Still Waiting for your debate with Ethan Winer.

lupahole
Автор

I have in my lifetime collection about 500 cd's, some of which i thought sounded pretty good untill about 4 years ago when I was interduced to DSD. I then started buying SACD's instead, ripping them and sending to my Aurender N10. The difference to me was very noticeable to me right from the start. Recently when I was unfortunately diagnosed with Covid 19, I decided I was going to give myself a project and convert all of my CD's to DSD. I purchased some software online and worked for 6 days on the conversion process. Before long I was hearing those CD's for the first time again! They sound so much better in DSD! Don't get me wrong, my Holo May KTE makes CD's sound very good but the converted DSD files sound more analog. I will also say I have some CD's that were just bad recordings, DSD doesn't help that. They are still bad recordings! Overall, I am very happy I converted my entire collection and it was definately worth the time and effort it took to complete. The only drawback on this is storage. The DSD files take up 3 to 4 times the space on your disc drives. I have a couple of Drobo's so to me it wasn't a big deal but if you have a lot of conversions, you'll need a space to store them.

ronaldwoznock
Автор

So, If I can't have a Directsream Dac due to my economic limitations, but have a DSD decoding dac, can I use a software to convert all my music into my HDDs or rip my cds to DSD files and then send that via USB to my dac and get better sound due to better and simpler decoding?

julioaperales
Автор

Alright, this got me curious so i proceeded to convert a well recorded 44.1kHz/16-bit wav/pcm file to DSF/DSD 2.8Mhz using the Tascam hi-res editor software. I am very familiar with this song and I played a specific sequence of each file over and over and over using a DSD capable DAC and for the life of me i can't tell them apart. At this point i need to be proven wrong if i state that DSD is no better at decoding to analog a PCM file that was converted to DSD than PCM is at decoding to analog the original PCM file.

alexvlach
Автор

You definitely didn't answer the question. The guy asked a really technical question, the only way to answer it is to get into the weeds of technicalities. You avoided that when you didn't want to get into the details of PCM reproduction, but that's exactly the point of the question. Do you know the answer to the question?

FabianEason
Автор

Why does my DAC produce better output when I upsample? Why does another DAC I have sound better when I stream DSDx2? The answer is, essentially, my software (I use JRiver) is good at doing this conversion, and the DAC is better at reproducing this input than the native 44.1khz/16bit. There may be any number of reasons for this, but the point is that DACs are not perfect, and that is why you do such conversions.

edwardallenthree
Автор

I had a cheap Topping DAC for a while that was buggy in converting PCM to DSD before reaching the DAC. But now I have a new DAC that does it beautifully and is a much better sounding DAC (Matrix mini i pro).

brendanhoffmann
visit shbcf.ru