Proof by Contradiction: Arithmetic Mean & Geometric Mean

preview_player
Показать описание

Рекомендации по теме
Комментарии
Автор

Great! You are amazingly skilled at giving clear and concise explanations! 

shairozsohail
Автор

Thank your for the clarity, awesome job!

warbyvlog
Автор

This is a great way of tackling this problem. It makes more sense and is layed out in a more progressive manner than the more direct approach I decided to take. In itself this proof is quite basic when considering just two values or even a countable set of values. I wonder, however, if someone were to set out a proof for the AM-GM mean for n number of values, where would they begin? Starts to get messy when thinking of proof by induction and gets even messier when taking a direct approach with logarithms. :o

Thanks for the video, by the way. Having another way to think of a problem really makes you see the depth of a problem and understand it better. Great job!

usmanalam
Автор

Great video and proof, thank you. What if you start by assuming [sqrt(a)-sqrt(b)]^2>=0 (strictly greater if a != b)? Then you just square the LHS and solve in terms of a+b/2 to get the same result.

macdondb
Автор

gr8 video Thnx ... it would help in trignometry

sushruttrivedi
Автор

I can see why some students cringe when they see this type of proof poop up in an exam. It really requires a different way of thinking when compared to the calculus that is heavily emphasized in high school maths. My peers showed me a proof for this exact problem, they instead assumed an identity and used it to prove the statement. To what extent are we allowed to use this method of proof in extension 1 mathematics to prove inequality statements?

LOLxUnique
Автор

Isn't there a possibility that both statements (> and <) are wrong?

AeanHD
Автор

is he teaching a class or just making a video?

aashsyed