KUHN! Philosophy Battle - SCIENCE WARS - FULL EPISODE 3

This is Episode 3 in the Series for the Philosophy of Science Battlefield.
PLEASE WATCH SUBSCRIBE and Check out Episode 2 FALSIFICATION

LINK TO NEXT VIDEO:

LINK TO PREVIOUS VIDEO:

Twitter:
To support me
or

Track: Last Heroes - Dimensions [NCS Release]
Music provided by NoCopyrightSounds.

Other Music purchased from Video Co-Pilot (I have paid for the licensing and use).

Thomas S. Kuhn. "Logic of Discover or Psychology of Research?"
Readings in the Philosophy of Science: From Positivism to Postmodernism, ed. Theodore Schick Jr. Mountain View, CA: Mayfield, 2000. Print. 13-19.

Patrick J. J. Philips. The Challenge of Relativism. New York, NY,: Continuum, 2007. 22.

10/09/2018

"A few years ago I happened to meet Kuhn at a scientific meeting and complained to him about the nonsense that had been attached to his name. He reacted angrily. In a voice loud enough to be heard by everyone in the hall, he shouted, "One thing you have to understand. I am not a Kuhnian." Freeman Dyson, The Sun, The Genome, and The Internet: Tools of Scientific Revolutions (1999)

----------------------------
IF YOU READ THIS. COOL.

[abdulkader]

great content when i first learned the popper way of falsification and distinction between science and pseudoscience i said the same thing happens with science but kuhn knew how to elaborate the idea and explain it in a reasonable rational way

[MarkovChains]

Dude... great video!! It's a shame this hasn't gotten more views!

[dominikvonlavante]

Positivism does get you anywhere because of confirmation bias. This is why Popper's falsification sword is so sharp.

[BenjaminKBroderick]

I see this as just empiricism and rationalism having differences in utility while being inseparably entangled, rationalism being the upstream from which empiricism becomes possible. Innate rules are built in.

[cosminu.]

I do not agree with Kuhn idea that philosophy does not have constraints as oppose to science. If you are a dualist, for example, no matter how good arguments are there for a theory of consciousness that says that it's a product of the brain, the dualist would not accept it. He will try to poke holes in it which is fine .... that's how philosophy works..

[abdulkader]

so what you basically mean is that if we have only one falsification we should blame the person and not the theory but when we have a multiple falsification tests we can blame the theory ? plz reply

[bon]

No to neutral observational language of positivist? Whats this about?

[abdulkader]

and one more thing if we apply this concept on freud psychoanalysis it is a science because freud did say why this didn t work and came with new ideas or am i wrong?