Where Does Mass Ultimately Come From? (99% of mass in the universe)

How it it that mass and energy can be the SAME thing. This video discusses what the true nature of what mass really is. What is the ultimate source of mass in an atom?

[mansoorsiddiqui]

I never looked it that way. FASCINATING! THX

[zack_]

"They are massless but when confined... the E is transformed to M" - a magic! 1st heard 😱

[stevewheeler]

I think that the bending inwards of space-time towards a mass (the gravity) is the energy absorbed by particles to keep their gluons vibrating at a constant frequency over time. Each particle needs "fuel" to keep the gluons vibrating at a constant frequency. This fuel is minuscule pieces of space-time ingested by each gluon. Big clumps of particles ingest a lot of space-time and this is what we perceive as gravity. Gluons or other particles are not "perpetum mobile", they need to constantly absorb energy from the void around them to compensate for the energy lost by friction.

[readyfireaim]

So is it possible that the zero-of ourselves is negentropic? Subatomic to neutrons and protons?

That's a very deep and thought-provoking question about whether the fundamental nature or essence of ourselves and physical matter could be considered negentropic.

Here's one way to analyze this:

1) At the subatomic level, particles like quarks and leptons (electrons, muons, etc.) exhibit very precise, structured patterns of behavior governed by the Standard Model of particle physics. Their properties and interactions are not random.

2) Protons and neutrons, which make up atomic nuclei, also exhibit highly ordered, stable internal structures of quarks bound by the strong nuclear force.

3) Even at the atomic and molecular scale, the precise configurations of electron orbitals and chemical bonds again display order, pattern and structure rather than randomness.

4) This underlying order and pattern in the fundamental particles and forces of nature could be viewed as a kind of inherent "negentropy" - an embedded logic and structure to the fabric of reality.

5) Extending this line of thinking, one could argue that since we and all matter are ultimately composed of these ordered arrangements of subatomic particles, the core essence of our being arises from this negentropic foundation.

6) Our consciousness, biology, and essential nature as physical entities in the universe may therefore be emerging from or reflecting this primordial negentropy.

So in that philosophical sense, yes, it is possible to make the case that the "zero" or fundamental ground state of our existence as material beings is inherently negentropic rather than entropic or random.

Of course, this is a fascinating area of overlap between physics, philosophy and metaphysics about the essential order and logic underlying physical reality. But it does offer an intriguing perspective to consider the zero-point negentropy giving rise to the intricate complexities we observe in nature, including ourselves.

[justinklenk]

The implications of this fact in regard to the nature of existence itself - and our existence, if that's even ANY different! - is nothing less than endlessly staggering. It necessarily compels you beyond what-all cognition can conceive.

"It is 'empty, ' yes... But _empty_ with such _fullness..."_

[RomoRooster]

I think the animations of gravity need to change, it should pull the spacetime graphic up towards the particle instead of push it down into a funnel or well

[sushantm]

Liked it bro. Was thinking 🤔 of this since I was a kid

[Stanger_]

Since, Quarks have high intrinsic kinetic energy (due to their small mass) it makes sense that the strong Force is a form a potential energy that confines those vigourously moving quarks to an extremely small region of space. But the leftover Kinetic energy of quarks also translates to mass, doesnt it?

[alexh]

Avatar Arvin tracking a boulder as it flies near him does help convey the meaning of intrinsic energy. The sunglasses on the other hand, not too sure.

[bigsmoke]

My question is what is particle ?? What if is made of and whta creates it. And how can energy make particle ???

[adamrspears]

Can you please explain what flux tubes are?
Thank You. You videos are better than gold!

[williamblake]

Put a masslless particle inside the massless box, the box has mass now. You need a force to push it. If the particle is flying around we usually say-it has energy. If the particle is jiggling around one point we usually say-it has mass. The difference is because we measure them differently. There is no question about the essence of these two examples, they are the same thing. Our measurements makes them look different. And all this confusion is just because we did not put c squared coefficient on our weight measuring mechanisms.

[maxanimator]

I wonder how the significant the distortion from the mass of a trio of quarks is relative to nearby hadrons.

[observerone]

Everything in existence, even thought itself, is the flowing of forces.

[RandomVideos-zrne]

How does the Higgs Boson picture in this?

[LurkTheDarK]

This feels like such a small piece of a greater whole, it makes me wish i had a greater understanding of theoretical physics.

[ibmibm]

It reminds me of the Schrodinger experiment. The formation of gluons and muons into mass is deterministic or probabilistic ?

[valolo]

That was what I discovered recently. It is like a fuel(gravity) good job!

[martyrosadil]

What is going to happen if we somehow release the energy that connect quarks?
And how much energy will release?

[vivekraghuram]

How does this tie in with the Higgs field? I am genuinely curious