Understanding Node.js WriteStream Benchmarks: A Deep Dive into Performance and Memory Management

---

Visit these links for original content and any more details, such as alternate solutions, latest updates/developments on topic, comments, revision history etc. For example, the original title of the Question was: nodejs writeStream benchmarks checking understanding

If anything seems off to you, please feel free to write me at vlogize [AT] gmail [DOT] com.
---

The Problem at Hand

The challenge posed involves two functions that write the same amount of data to a file, but they differ in how they handle the internal buffering of the WriteStream. The question is: Why does the first function, which drains the buffer, take longer than the second one that does not?

Key Observations

Execution Time: The function that waits for the buffer to drain takes approximately 5.163 seconds. In contrast, the non-draining version finishes in about 4.948 seconds.

Memory Usage: Striking discrepancies in memory utilization were also noted:

Draining Function: Higher memory usage, but it carefully waits for the buffer to clear.

Non-Draining Function: Uses less memory but can lead to overflow issues in large datasets.

Analyzing the Solutions

Draining the Buffer

The first function uses the drain event to manage how data is written:

[[See Video to Reveal this Text or Code Snippet]]

This approach ensures that when the internal buffer reaches its limit, the function waits for it to clear before writing more data. However, this can result in a longer execution time as the process continuously checks for drain events.

Not Draining the Buffer

The second function skips waiting and writes directly:

[[See Video to Reveal this Text or Code Snippet]]

This implementation benefits from lower execution time but at a cost. When the buffer fills up, it can lead to high memory usage, as observed. The lack of draining can lead to MaxListenersExceededWarning if listeners accumulate, which can occur if the code attempts to listen for drain events while simultaneously writing.

Further Investigation of the Issues

In an experiment where setTimeout is used alongside the drain event, memory issues worsened:

[[See Video to Reveal this Text or Code Snippet]]

This snippet introduces unnecessary delays and can lead to a buildup of callbacks, resulting in excessive memory usage and the MaxListenersExceededWarning.

Recommendations for Improvement

To optimize both performance and memory handling, consider the following adjustments:

Replace:

[[See Video to Reveal this Text or Code Snippet]]

This ensures that the program waits for all writing operations to complete before finishing the stream.

Use once() Instead of on():
Adjust

[[See Video to Reveal this Text or Code Snippet]]

to

[[See Video to Reveal this Text or Code Snippet]]

This prevents the accumulation of listeners and avoids memory leak warnings.

Remove Redundant setTimeout():
Removing the setTimeout from waiting for the drain event can help maintain consistency in performance.

Conclusion