Paleontologist Reveals Newly Discovered Dinosaurs of 2024 Part 1

Step into the world of prehistoric discovery as paleontologist Evan Jevnikar unveils seven newly discovered dinosaurs of 2024 in this captivating video series. From towering herbivores to fearsome carnivores, each species brings a unique story to the ancient landscape. Join us on this thrilling journey through time as we explore the latest findings in paleontology!

Don't forget to subscribe to our channel and follow us on Instagram and Facebook for more fascinating updates in the world of dinosaurs and paleontology.

Edit: I totally misspoke when I was talking about when T. Mcraeensis lived. Whoops! In my notes I put that it lived 4 million years before T. rex (which would be 70 million years ago), but I accidentally said 62 million years ago. I can confirm that there were definitely no Tyrannosaurs that lived after the Cretaceous Mass Extinction lol. Thank you for your understanding!

#dinosaur #fossil #paleontology #paleontologist #dinos #jurassicpark #jurassicworld #fossils #science #naturalhistory

[JohnnydouglasYT]

And why doesn’t this have more views?!!??

[Tyrantlizard]

Okay, so when you're wanting to do videos related to paleontology, you have to keep in mind that paleontologists work closely with paleoartists to reconstruct and flesh out the fossils they find and study. Using AI not only poorly reconstructs these long extinct animals, but is also spitting in the faces of paleoartists who put their time and soul into making these beautiful pieces of art that you happen to display in your video. So if you can, please be considerate, and not use AI imagery when posting paleontology videos.

[Lazaro-tn]

Thank you! DDG love how informative your show is. Appreciate the knowledge. My favorite dinosaur is T McCrae Enis.

[jamesa.fitzpatrick]

62 million years ago? So 4 million years after all the dinosaurs went extinct?

[StratBurst]

Excellent presentation. I would still go with #1. I have a few fossils and have a T-Rex tooth tip from the Hell Creek formation.

[ShaneTidd]

Very cool! Good stuff very informative

[robertgolden]

Glad I found your channel. I’m a professional pilot. I should have become a Paleontologist. I’m 59 and still learning about dinosaurs.

[blackshadowarts]

Found you from instagram! Great stuff! ❤

[Caliber-R]

I absolutely love learning about dinosaurs and find them incredibly fascinating.

[Ams-Universe]

You deserve more views and i have subscribed

[adamcartwrigh]

Great info and I look forward to more, but as some have noticed the dates are off or wrong. I’m sure it was just a mistake but the correct info is that the newly-identified species, Tyrannosaurus mcraeensis, lived between 71 and 73 million years ago, or between 5 and 7 million years before T. rex.
64 million been the mass extinction event.
As for the 62 million I’m not sure what creatures were thriving at the time but wasn’t the above-mentioned.

[clarep.]

My nephew says his favorite is Tyrannosaurus Mcraensis. We were shocked to learn of a new Tyrannosaur. I thought the armor on the new Ankylosaur was pretty awesome.

[Jussi]

how did the "new" Tyrannosaur live 62 million years ago if nonavian dinosaurs went extinct 66 million years ago?

[avk]

You get a subscriber in me. Beautiful video this. I love all these dinosaurs you mentioned. I loved the explanation you gave to estimate the age of a dino. Awesome 😎

[yoni-in-BHAM]

You had me at dino guy!

Subscribed! 🦕🦖

[Pardogad]

Dinos where in every part of the planet, for 150 M of years, we know the 1% of them, we will keep discovering new ones every day, it's a never ending adventure.

[martasd]

Okay... 1) T-Macraeensis didn't live 62 MYA. Why am I so strict you may ask. Because 66 MYA there was a rock... Chixulub impactor to be precise. It hit the ground and thrugh few hundred years dinosaurs were wiped out. Well, 62 is less than 66 isn't it? It is. But the point is that it is BC, so -62 > -66. 62 MYA there were mammals taking place on top of the foodchain.

[theengineeringscience]

I haven't seen this proposed anywhere yet: Might the strong bony structures (horn protrusions included) on Tyrannosaur faces been a direct response to the Ceratopsians? Yes, ideally one would ambush a ceratopsian to avoid the head armor. Also yes, because T-saurs had their own head armor they could engage in pecking order face-biting.
But neither of those preclude an increased survival if a T-saur had to parry C-sian strikes with its face in order to get a good bite. So if the ambush failed, just fight with your head and mouth like a hippopotamus. Big teeth, lots of armor and armament up front to protect the rib cage. No threat of a horn penetrating the nasal area of a T-saur even from a Triceratops, etc. If one can withstand face biting from another T-saur, it can withstand at least a glancing horn blow. Even if just to get clear for the next ambush.

I'm still operating under the rule that even though predators don't win every hunt, they also don't die every other hunt. If the situation becomes unfavorable, most predators disengage. Wounds heal, predators survive. For some reason many paleontologists but ceratopsians (prey) on equal footing with tyrannosaurs (predators), which doesn't really work if a T-saur is to live to be 30 years old, ate another big dinosaur weekly, and simultaneously died 50% of all hunts now does it?

[AK-ffgv]

is your job being a dinosaur guy fulltime? if so thats very cool! i hope you find many and make some cool documentaries.

[fgialcgorge]

Pretty sure 62mya the non-avian dinosaurs were extinct. Yeah, I'm certain of it.