Proof: Limit Law for Quotient of Convergent Sequences | Real Analysis

preview_player
Показать описание
We prove the limit law for the quotient of convergent sequences. If a_n converges to a and b_n converges to b, then the sequence a_n/b_n converges to a/b, provided that b isn't 0, and each b_n is not 0. Put simply, the quotient of convergent sequences converges to the quotient of their limits. This is a slightly tricky proof using the epsilon definition of a convergent sequence, and some fun absolute value inequality manipulations!

★DONATE★

Thanks to Robert Rennie and Barbara Sharrock for their generous support on Patreon!

Follow Wrath of Math on...

Рекомендации по теме
Комментарии
Автор

Thanks! The limit law videos are great.

christianpotts
Автор

fantastic video! I'm finding that in reading proofs online or trying to prove them myself i'm left feeling hopeless in where the aspects of the proof come from like why use this law and not another - why create this inequality and not another - etc. This was a great explanation of both the proof and motivations of the proof so it solved this issue for me - thank you!

seven.
Автор

this is more satisfactory than that of abbott's approach. Thanks in advance!

spiderjerusalem
Автор

5:26 Can't you make |bn - b| smaller than ε*|b|*|k| where k is the upper bound of bn and you know |bn| < |k|?

loo
Автор

Great Video! Well explained and really well made!
Also a quick question, wouldn't this method of proof require that we also proof the Limit Product Laws for convergent sequences? I've seen other proofs without that, but this seems like a lot more cleaner and simple proof.
As always, thanks for the great video!

geno
Автор

How did you find the epsilon absolute of b squared over w

rivaschristian
Автор

If b is zero then sequence an/ bn diverge?

akavyascv
Автор

Where were you when I was taking undergrad analysis??

joshmckinney
Автор

There are some ambiguous fact which I'm yet to comprehend

abdulazeezbamidele
Автор

keep doing what you are doing, really good work

parasmittal
Автор

I understand algebraically why |b_n| > |b| / 2 but not conceptually

malawigw