The Rules for Sorcerer Make no Sense - D&D

preview_player
Показать описание


#shorts

Dungeons and Dragons, XP to level 3 with Davvychappy, potentially a bit a Critical Role with dungeoneering, tabletop community next to tabletop RPG, dungeons and dragons, Fjord, Beau, Jester, Yasha, Caleb, Nott, 5th edition dragons, 3.5e, dungeon dudes, DM GM, dungeon master, game master tips sprinkle a bit of Caduceus, Mollymauk in the Mighty Nein. Matt Mercer.
Рекомендации по теме
Комментарии
Автор

Quick note: fireball does not target a creature, it targets an area

CavemanZerron
Автор

I agree. The spell gives 1 creature a breath weapon. It targets 1 creature, there's nothing else to say.

Calpsotoma
Автор

Our DM also disregarded Crawford's ruling on dragon's breath. And my storm sorcerer did rejoice.

mrbean
Автор

At the end of the day, the DM can alter any rule he likes if he believes it's for the best.

maddukex
Автор

This is less "sorcerer makes no sense" and more "why in 7 hells are we singling out this one particular buff?"

Konpekikaminari
Автор

People need to understand; Crawford does not implement rules anymore. What he says may be what was intended, but not actually what's in the book. His rules are non canon

greatjagras
Автор

Here’s something else that’s kind of dumb:

Eldritch blast can be twinspelled… unless you’re level 5+

The idea of a sorcerer technically losing an ability due to becoming more powerful is just a little funny to me.

benjaminkingsley-jones
Автор

I have to say, though, that (according to Crawford) you can't, in fact, twin firebolt, since it has the ability to target an object

xuklysc
Автор

Crawford is always overruled by your DM. He's also too obsessed with elves which makes his words worth even less.

lordmars
Автор

Me who immediately goes for subtle spell to cast stinking cloud: "aww who farted?"

WillTea
Автор

My man actually pulled out a clip from a cinematic from that game that got sued by league, didn't expect that lmao

kyriosxx
Автор

Almost every yltime Crawford makes a statement.
"Yeah ill ignore that"

sirgideonofnir
Автор

As long as you can feasibly imagine two instances of a spell being cast simultaneously, I say why not?

YurgenGrimwood
Автор

I am living for the RuneScape music in the background ❤

ShadowFan
Автор

Y’all haven’t lived till you’ve twin spelled disintegrate

fobbles_
Автор

For nostalgic reasons, your choice of background music is therapeutic. Lumbridge for the win

ghostmatrix
Автор

I had the same discussion about ice knife. While yes the cold explosion can affect multiple targets, the spell itself specifically says that you "target one creature" with the actual knife.

Nintardo
Автор

For area of effect I would make it to double the area with twinned spell instead of casting the spell twice
It has sense, it has utility, you're allowing more interactions and it has the same damage output, only an increasing range
For example, Healing Circle (I think that's the name) with twinned spell would allow you to create a larger area to fit more people inside, instead of doubling the effect and therefore healing more than intended

Ervo
Автор

Twinned Mind Sliver into quickened banishment upcast to target both creatures you mind sliver has been one of my favorites to take people out of fights. I’ve also been stacking bane and mind sliver and man debuffing is fun.

shaylic
Автор

I let Twinned Spell work on ANY spell.
It's never broken my game and seems fair considering the amount of Sorcerer Points they get.

skullsquad