Particles can behave differently when observed | quantum physics | physics | subatomic particles

There are two types of quantum particles: fermions, which have a spin multiple of one-half, and bosons, which have a spin multiple of one. Fermions are electrons, protons, and neutrons.

Subscribe to learn more of physics experiments, physics theories and interesting physics facts.

#shorts #physics #physicsfacts #quantumphysics

[aditisinha]

So that's the reason why i get slow internet speed as soon as I look at it

[jakeg]

The universe is so fucking bizarre. Inutuitively, it feels like some kind of setup, or maybe a cruel joke. Maybe the "life is a simulation" folks aren't crazy after all

[aminur]

This is why everytime I lost my key 🗝️🔐

[jonwhite]

It's not "observe" rather it is when we "measure" the particles.

[GPCTM]

bull*
people love it because they think it's complicated. It's just making drama out of a bad description of a phenomenon. And a way to keep jobs.

[memawscheesetiddies]

Particles aren’t “aware we are looking at them”. Subatomic particles are so small that it is literally impossible to observe them without affecting their behavior. The light, radiation, etc that is emitted from equipment used to observe subatomic particles is enough to physically influence them, and this is why they “behave differently when observed”. Simply looking at them with the naked eye will obviously not do anything.

[ZacharyStinnett]

No. Not avderve with your eyes. But with measurment quipment. Only several ways to go about iT. Get it now? You can't see electrons.

No they are not "aware" lmfao.

[genxmark]

observation is like focus; which is why it's where the beginning of manifesting desires and creation starts; with our mind.

[VirtualQuarkInterface]

This is sorta misleading, observation when it comes to quantum mechanics is a very active process. When you place a detector at the barrier it either absorbs the particle or fires an electron/photon at it. That physical interaction is what causes the state change, not the person reading the data.

[Moussiah]

So how do we know they’re behaving differently when we aren’t observing them?

[Jacob]

Just like a watched pot will never boil water

[TRminLCuRisiTy]

I dont think the particles are aware that we are looking at them. I think they react differently in the presence of light. We can only look at something in the presence of light. So please stop the obscurantism.

[sMVshortMusicVideos]

or, Are the waves aware and then turn into particles, either way its a strange reality.

[dhanunjay]

How do they know we're not observing them ?

[kylecurtisify]

Maybe when observed the influence of time is presented on them? The way we perceive everything is based around time.

[spark]

when we observe we interact, when we interact they react.

not because they know about us but we affect them while observing like light, radiation etc etc.

[JacqueRaymer]

The same thing happens when someone doing something in private compared to doing something in public when others are watching. The behaviour is never the same for either.

[TICKFORDXR]

So when you look at your finger it's 100% appearing to be real why the things you see around it out the corners of your eyes are basic 2D images so to speak. Basically ON and OFF. ( observed ) and ( not observed ) Kinda like digital code for graphics, 1s and 0s to make up the illusion.

[j.k]

matrix engine, it renders when observed. our brains, consciousness or soul are the observer, with a dmt trip you break the engine

[Sht-ib]

Fun fact: the observer effect is not a proven phenomenon it indeed was a thought experiment by ernest rutherford and it could not be put to test yet because of technological unfeasibility