Why Don't Large Things Behave Like Quantum Particles? #shorts

preview_player
Показать описание
Рекомендации по теме
Комментарии
Автор

That’s the answer of a question I wanted to know ever since I knew about quantum physics. Thank you!

karapetrov-ic
Автор

One of the very BEST science educators out there!

aclearlight
Автор

10^15 atoms is an extreme underestimation. Squash ball has a mass of 23-25 grams, the main ingredient is rubber with atoms of C, H and S, the most prevalent ones are H and C with molar mass of 1 and 12. So, by estimate a squash ball can have at least 2 moles of atoms meaning the number of atoms is around 2 times Avogadro number which is 6, 02*10^23. So you underestimated it by the factor of 1 billion (10^9).

dmitriy
Автор

This is actually really crazy. I didn’t know they have gotten better coherence on that scale. Well, there goes my week I’ll be in front of the computer lol.

darenmiller
Автор

It is possible to get large object to act as quantum wave in coherent manner: example Helium Superfluid.

Roust
Автор

I love when you say it's called decoherence after you explained it. Naming is misleading most of the time for example when we say particle spin 🙄

Hassane_B
Автор

That is the first time I have heard this explained, but it is how I have always explained it.

tesos
Автор

Bose-Einstein condensate should be called quantum condensation to be descriptive of what is going on.

Roust
Автор

A squash ball made of 10^15 atoms? Sounds way, way off. That would imply roughly 10^5 atoms wide in each dimension. A squash ball is 40mm wide, implying the width between two atoms is 4 micrometers. Actual distance between atoms is less than 200 picometers, over 20, 000 times less. Multiplying by three dimensions, it seems the squash ball should have 8 trillion times more atoms than 10^15, or almost 10^28 atoms.

gene
Автор

I think you read my mind. I was just thinking about this subject, trying to reason about it, to see if I really understand it. Thank you for explaining it so clearly.

BrianOSheaPlus
Автор

Maybe only 1% of them in uniform, could you imagine 100%? That thing would destroy everything around it

donmcatee
Автор

Not feasible doesn't not mean impossible. That's a slightly terrifying thought

StarbornCthulhu
Автор

For a squash ball we only need to improve by 10E11! Let‘s Go! 😂

ingoh.
Автор

Bose-Einstein-condensate would be a coherent form of matter.

ZaphodB
Автор

Same way sound moves through a wave.or Makes a Wave.?

ManyHeavens
Автор

Is quantum physics a relative subject according to size of observers

sciencespectrum
Автор

i was literally just studying this in the university

npc
Автор

Is an object that just reaches decoherence free of determinism at that moment?

JackPullen-Paradox
Автор

your shorts videos are the best, keep going!

RelaxMode
Автор

Wow this is exactly what I was looking for. The double slit experiment was able to be repeated with larger molecules with the disturbance pattern and I think I have an argument against the “conscious particle” theory where people believe these quantum vibrations are reacting to the act of being consciously observed and changing their properties accordingly. I do not think so, I think it had to do with something within the experiment itself physically, therefor “quantumly” lol interacting with these electrons and forcing a certain behavior

jimboSleeeeiiice