Interior Arch-Viz | D5 Render vs Chaos Vantage vs Unreal Engine 5

Escena interior trabajada con 3dsmax.
RTX 3060 SUPER AMD RYZEN 7

Contacto:

Música:
Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported (CC BY 3.0)

[kayotic]

The lighting shadows from the Xmas tree and lamp on Unreal 🤩

[aptdvisualization]

for unreal engine, 2 hours seems you use lumen, i want to see if you use path tracer for more realistic lighting. then compare it to vantage and d5. if you want to make it fast use d5, but if you want a close to realistic use unreal with path tracer. but if you're working with vray go for vantage.

[azarelthecreator]

These only look so different because they all have different exposure levels. They all could have had their exposures matched and then it would have been a proper comparison.

[ololo]

Great comparison. Just a note for you: Vantage settings could be optimized a lot to render significantly faster. Probably the same is true for the others. Vantage though is quite fast even with a mid-tier RTX card today. I also think the GI results from Vantage look by far the most realistic of these three. All excellent pieces of software though!

[fianmu]

D5 render for faster workflow and cheap license

[maharasad]

I have 4 year experience of 3d visulizing and also have 3 year deploma DAE but now i want to free couress any univeristy and colloge can you tell me about any colloge and uni

[llih]

Still image: Vantage wins, very very close to VRay quality.
Animation: D5 wins, cheap, fast, and very convenient to add weather effects and dynamic trees.

[ngarcia-tl]

Honestly, the industry reach to a point when is up to the artist to get a good render. I believe is about workflow speed now...

[alanmichellev]

El de unreal es con PT o lumen?? Por que se me hace mucho tiempo con Lumen

[roman_cg]

Thank you for this video comparison of programs. I noticed some problems with lighting rendering in UE. Perhaps this was due to the render settings or the lighting itself?
It’s also interesting how different the engines themselves are. I heard a theory that they are fundamentally very similar and are built on the same technologies. Have you heard about this?

[alvarogzz]

D5 Render sweet spot, time and rsults

[phalhappy]

despite poor dynamic range, Chaos Vantage look the most realistic to me

[AAAAAAndreyAndreev]

8 hours ?!?!?! WHAT ??? you definitely can optimize that and get the same result

[juliossantos]

The settings are clearly wrong, the D5's is very low quality and the Vantage is out of adjustment... not even Unreal would ever take 2 hours to render a simple scene like this!!

[Carolina-mwpo]

Look at the ceiling! Vantage has a complex raytraced GI, you can see the incidence from the outdoors making complex light/shadows shapes as it occurs in real life.
Look at the pillow how it receives the correct GI reflection from the bed.
And for the rendering time, this scene should take 30 minutes at most with 60 samples.
You must have been exaggerated the samples, otherwise it's impossible for Vantage to take 8 hours for such a scene! 😮
I work with Vantage and I use 30 samples for interiors. Sometimes 60 samples, and hardly 100 samples.
My rendering time is 4sec to 10sec a frame with an rtx3070, a mid/low range card.

[brunobordini]

D5 looks amazing for the time it took! D5 wins for sure!

[chetan]

D5 render is winner is quality and time.

[Lnny]

vantage looks best imo. but what is it with the 8 hours render time? it shouldn't take that long even with a 3060.

[gonanavasdosaches]

GENIAL, EN TU EXPERIENCIA QUE SE NECESITA PARA CORRER EL

[sanchos]

there is clearly no lumen here, look at the shadows it says “preview”, he didn’t bake them...