Genghis Khan VS Napoleon Bonaparte - Comparison of Historical Figures

[oorangejar]

Both rose, but Chingis Khan rose from basically ashes, literally almost dying countless times and yet somehow arose and unified the tribes, I just don't understand how. Napolean is also great though don't get me wrong.

[Juan-zior]

Napoleon died a loser after waterloo. Whereas Genghis khan died, of old age, as the head of the biggest empire at the time.

[Lord_of_cap]

good idea and video, but in my opinion Napoleon is far better than Gengis Khan

[Carbun]

Genghis Khan's face whenever he gets a point scares the shit out of me

[Averifiedperson]

leadership: Napoleon
Napoleon should win

[aaronoof]

Napoleon with the musket shotgun joins the chat now.😂

[dappeld]

Genghis Khan is easily the best leader ever

[myjobistoshootfire]

One branch from the Mongol Empire is probably enough for Napoleons whole army lmao!😂🤣

[chanFootballMemes]

Napoleon would steamrole Genghis Khan like how the modern US military would steamrole Napolean. You cannot compare armies of different eras simply due to differences in technology.

[CRRonaldo]

Fun fact: during france inavasion of russia 1812. Mongolian kalymk soilders hunted Napoleon soilders with bow and arrow

[Omcs]

Napoleon would have obliterated Genghis Khan.

[Messiisthebest]

Genghis Khan would make Napoleon cry just from how big he is compared to the French shrimp but I will say that Napoleon was a strategic leader with him finding ways to overcome a fierce Mongol army

[nickoangelo]

⁠Khan’s strength was baiting out the large numbers into smaller numbers and then encircling them to wipe them out. Many generals in Napoleon’s time were much smarter than they were back then yet somehow he still managed to find new ways to outthink them and he did so on the spot.

It’s hard to say because statistically, yeah Khan is the better strategist. But thinking from a logical sense, Napoleon is likely the more clever thinker

[lordmolag]

Napoleon's army, in terms of modern day weaponry, would easily beat the Mongols. However, in terms of the ability to conquer land and sheer ruthlessness in combat, Genghis wins imo.

[gusfring]

Gengis: conquers a bunch of nomadic tribesmen and a weak china and middle east

Napoleon: conquers Europe while up against the Russian empire, great Britain, Austrian empire, Spanish empire, etc.

[idiotsgame]

As an asian i think napoleon is better because of conquering europe is lot harder than just conquering asia, also napoleons era technology was much much advanced than genghis khans, means its harder and complicated to battle, and napoleons enemys was advanced and tough enemies(uk russia austria prussia sweden etc) but genghis enemies was china and iraq( china was divided at that time) just my opinion tho..

[ashersales]

Napoleon is the greatest military general of all time, while Genghis Khan was the greatest leader of all time (Caesar may be better, I don't know).

[perfectvictor]

17 and 18 the century great leader come from france louis ixth and napolian bonaparte

[TbV-stef]

Omg this entire comment section is full of nerds debating who would win. What has humanity become this is so pathetic. This is not made for seriousness but for entertainment

[godphantom]

People in the comments are spamming “ye but Napoleon with gun LISTEN WE GET IT BUT WE ARE COMPARING WHO WAS A BETTER CONQUEROR AND WARLORD