Harmonic functions: Mean value theorem

preview_player
Показать описание
Рекомендации по теме
Комментарии
Автор

Learned more than the class I paid $1200 to attend...  Thanks

npr
Автор

Exciting... I'm seeing all of these ideas I know about and heaps I have no idea about and understanding how all this fits together is a boggle. Can't wait till the holidays :D

porkypine
Автор

My question to you, Chris, is why did you change "r" (radius of the ball), for "R", in the proof.

gustavobagu
Автор

Minute 10:28 ... an R should come out in front of the partial d/dr ... Right?

gustavobagu
Автор

I think it would be easier to introduce the directional derivative of direction of radial vector instead of parameterising.

minhokim
Автор

thanks, can You please explain why the solutions of Laplace's equations are continuous?

zeinabashtab
Автор

9:40 if you use "chain rule" R disapear, you will have ux cost+uy sint, doesn't it?

АртемПоляков-жю
Автор

why is it Ux*dy -Uy*dx and not Ux*dx + Uy*dy ??

good video!

matthiasstahli
Автор

Something isn't quite right. at 9:40 you claim that d/dR by the chain rule would give you the integrand but it doesn't. You have an extra R in the integrand. I think the reason is that you didn't divide by |r'(t)| = R which is necessary to give you the unit normal since you are not parameterizing by arc length. Or, I could be wrong.

finweman