Understanding RLock Behavior in Python's Multithreading: Why Multiple Threads Acquire at Once

Discover the unexpected behavior of `RLock` in Python's threading module and learn how to resolve it for predictable thread management.
---

Visit these links for original content and any more details, such as alternate solutions, latest updates/developments on topic, comments, revision history etc. For example, the original title of the Question was: Reentrant lock acquires (locks) by more than one thread

If anything seems off to you, please feel free to write me at vlogize [AT] gmail [DOT] com.
---
Understanding RLock Behavior in Python's Multithreading

In the realm of Python programming, especially when dealing with multithreading, managing access to shared resources is crucial. A commonly used threading primitive is the RLock (reentrant lock), which is designed to allow a thread to acquire the same lock multiple times without causing a deadlock. However, unexpected behavior can occur, particularly when multiple threads seem to acquire the same RLock simultaneously. In this post, we will explore this phenomenon, understand why it happens, and provide a solution for achieving the expected behavior.

The Issue at Hand

Let's look at a simplified scenario where you have three threads designed to acquire a shared RLock:

[[See Video to Reveal this Text or Code Snippet]]

Expected Behavior

When you run this code, you might expect that only one thread can access the RLock at a time, leading to the following output:

[[See Video to Reveal this Text or Code Snippet]]

However, the output often shows that multiple threads acquire the lock and print their ending messages, indicating that the RLock was not functioning as expected.

Unexpected Output

You may actually see output like this, which is contrary to expectations:

[[See Video to Reveal this Text or Code Snippet]]

This leads to confusion, as it seems like all threads can acquire the RLock without waiting.

Why Does This Happen?

The core of this issue revolves around thread lifecycle and the timing of starting threads. The lock is released when a thread is destroyed or no longer alive. Thus, if there’s minimal or no work being done inside your threads, they can finish nearly instantaneously, and you may see multiple threads starting, running, and finishing almost at the same time.

For example, if you don't introduce any waiting period or workload in your thread's function, the RLock can be released by one thread just as another thread starts executing, leading to the misinterpretation of thread behavior.

Solution: Using Barriers for Controlled Execution

To avoid the unexpected behavior and ensure that the acquisition of the RLock is orderly, you can implement a synchronization primitive called a barrier. This allows you to control when threads can begin executing their critical sections.

Here’s how to refine the previous example using threading.Barrier:

[[See Video to Reveal this Text or Code Snippet]]

Expected Output

With the implementation of barriers, the output will now show only one thread acquiring the lock at a time, similar to:

[[See Video to Reveal this Text or Code Snippet]]

This change ensures that threads wait for one another, presenting a more controlled and predictable flow of thread execution.

Conclusion

Understanding how RLock works within Python's threading module can help prevent unexpected behavior in multi-threaded programs. By using mechanisms like barriers, you can synchronize your threads effectively, which leads to better resource management and avoids the pitfalls of concurrent executions.

When dealing with multi-threading, always make sure to think critically about thread life cycles and how locks are managed to avoid confusing outcomes.