More 'God Instances' Prove Paul is a False apostle - Jesus is the Law

There are what many people call coincidences in the bible that are actually God instances that shed a light on Paul being a false apostle.
I also reference the Shepherd of Hermas in which we are told that Christ "is the Law". This is similar to him being called "the Word". Or "the Living Word"
Well, if Paul tears down the law or does away with it, it than means that he has tore down Christ and done away with him since he is the Law.

The following is a link to the video I recently uploaded in which I discuss other "God instances" in scripture that identify Paul as a false apostle. The title of the video is: God Sheds Light on Paul being a False Apostle - No Coincidences in Scripture

The following is a link to a video of mine titled: Proof That Paul Is A Apostle Of Satan

[strikemaster]

I just realised something; Here is a God (Jehovah) who for 4000 years ALWAYS chose one of His own believers, to preach and prophecy His WAY to the multitude. Suddenly, He choses a non-believer (Paul), who oppresses Gods own people, to do His preaching to the multitude? Hehe, I don't think so! The devil can come in the form of an angel... be careful.

[jaccidixon]

I agree with what your saying about Paul, I just didn’t want to read anything, he wrote. I found his sayings contradict what Jesus said.

[CrystalChiEuphoricGardens]

Shalom may the Creator give his chosen discernment and truth in these last of days

[williamnixon]

TO QUESTION THE LAW IS TO QUESTION THE LORD IESUS CHRIST

[Ancientofdaysx]

We need to return to the law. Sacrifice is not needed anymore because of christ but we must keep the law at all cost.

[krazyswede]

Well as I have been telling family and friends when the two witnesses are sent to preach like our Messiah the Pauline Churches will not recognize their words and declare them false !

[landisbrown]

Thank you for The Truth my Brother!!! Jesus is the Law!

[GabrielRodriguez-oiyz]

Thanks for the upload. Continue testing everything.

[theseed]

@trustinjc I heard a theory on Judas if you're interested in reading, and it makes sense to me however I'm new, I'm a year old into this but I read often. If you're not interested in theories, read no further than this paragraph lol. Thank you for what you point out - I attend a fellowship that recently came to terms with the fact that Paul's writings contradict the gospels of Jesus's actual apostles, who walked with him, who's feet he washed, who Jesus actually breathed upon, no flaming tongues needed haha. He was not an apostle, just "a-paul-saul" haha, Shalom!

Remember the group of rebels Judas hung out with? They had it in their minds that Yeshua/Jesus was meant to topple the powers that be(at that time) and take the throne. Judas taking 30 pieces of silver to betray Jesus seems ridiculous, it was referenced that around 200 is half a year's wages in some versions of the bible in John 6:7. So the theory is this: Judas thought that by turning him in, he would fast track the process altogether - that perhaps an army of angels would come to Jesus's aid to defend him against his adversaries. To put it short: it could've been a plan gone horribly wrong, a plan he carried out because he wasn't listening to Jesus, many of his apostles kept thinking from a temporal point of view rather than the eternal, or the fulfilment of scripture as well(before he came back to life). So this could be why he killed himself later upon realizing he betrayed Jesus? I don't see why he would purposefully betray him, for what may be a 1/10th of a year's wages and then later hang himself for it - I think God forgave him and I forgive him too... of course this doesn't change the fact of what had actually happened, he was a thief and he loved his coin, he probably took the ransom as a bonus. And even though he committed suicide he surely did repent. He was one of the twelve... I'm pretty sure they don't replace them right? The 12 established are the only 12 there ever will be before the throne of God? I'm open for answers, it's just a thought experiment at best - I'm curious to know what you think of the twelve, or the fact that in the book of acts replacements were made (but I'm not even sure to trust any of Paul's writings, could it all be fiction? Are replacements even legit to begin with? smells fishy).

[inthenamemosthigh]

Paul is against the alliance covenant of Abraham Genesis 17 exodo 12 Joshua 5 Ezekiel 44: 8 Luke 2: 21 John 7: 23 acts 7: 8 acts 21.. Galatians 2.. shows division between Paul's doctrine a pharisee/ and Peter who did not feed the flock but freely gave his hand was led to a place where he didn't want to go.. through Paul Christianity was established and he establish Rome's church pope

[AjumentaDaTriboDeIssacar]

What about Apollo / Apollo / Apollyon .. his friend


I planted the seed, Apollos watered it …

[lauratempestini]

Lavern thank you for this video . It would greatly strengthen your message if you would give the Bible verses.

[beekau]

What about the fact that he suffered for Jesus' Name?
What about the fact that he even prophesied in Thessalonians, Timothy etc. about the coming of Christ ?
I'm genuinely asking by the way :)

[bestpossibleworld]

Okay, here are just a few "proofs" that St. Paul was not a false Apostle:

1. St. Luke spends an inordinate amount of time in his Luke/Acts narrative showing what Jesus did on earth (Luke) and from heaven (Acts). Hence, according to St. Luke, Paul was strictly and only the work of Christ. Luke tells us that Paul taught what the Risen Lord instructed him to proclaim.
2. In Acts 15, at the Council of Jerusalem, St. Peter and St. James both backed Paul and Barnabas against the "party of circumcision." If Paul was false then the Gentiles cannot be included without circumcision.
3. St. Peter embraces Paul as a "beloved brother", warns Christians not to "distort" Paul's epistles and equates Paul's writings with Scripture (2Peter 3:15-16).
4. There is no hint in the Apostolic Fathers that St. Paul was considered a false Apostle. In fact, it is quite the opposite.
5. The Church Fathers relied heavily on the epistles of St. Paul.
6. The ancient 1st church venerated both St Peter and St. Paul as martyrs in Rome under the Emperor Nero.

Against this real historical evidence we have the "tin hat" nonsensical ponderings of the anti-Paul cult. Take your pick.

[TomOwensUAP]

Is there anyone on the thread willing to walk with me through certain details? I've noticed that very few people have read the parallel histories written by Yosef ben Matityahu that have parallels in the NT parody of the Essene Qumran scrolls. When I ask questions, they are either ignored or they are ridiculed with providing an opportunity for me to give the additional briefing that would clarify. We should never become angry (Raca) or ridicule people and we should strive to honestly answer well formed and polite questions, because ignoring them only feeds those who claim that we are a part of the problem of dwindling love.
....
I have some questions for anyone ready.

[は私です彼の名前]

It is very very interesting what you are saying because I have had all of these same thoughts. The one thing that gives me pause is that Peter and another [original] apostle basically approved Paul as a minister of the gospel. But I wonder if it was in obedience to Yeshua when HE said to leave another alone if they use HIS name. This is all very thought provoking and worthy of meditation and prayer. Also, Paul
undeniably speaks truth about Christ at times and the other apostles Did warn that Paul’s words will be destructive to those who misunderstand and misuse.

[BasementBerean]

It isn't Paul's fault that professional Christians of relatively recent history have taken his words out of context and created "easy believism" doctrines out of them. Other than that, so many false relationships between unrelated data bits and false conclusions drawn from them that it's not worth my time to explain. Unsubbing.

[giorgosissaris]

Why Elohim killed the people who ate quail in numbers 11?

[Master_LaSon]

It's all part of the plan brother
Just some sifting
I prepared a response for your original vid from 11yr ago but it won't fit 😂
Just kept saying Invalid arguement so I'll chalk that up to divine intervention
Maybe what I had to offer wasn't approved

[shannonhamby]

Please show me where Paul said he was a citizen of Rome?

And as they bound him with thongs, Paul said unto the centurion that stood by, Is it lawful for you to scourge a man that is a Roman, and uncondemned? When the centurion heard that, he went and told the chief captain, saying, Take heed what thou doest: for this man is a Roman. Then the chief captain came, and said unto him, Tell me, art thou a Roman? He said, Yea. And the chief captain answered, With a great sum obtained I this freedom. And Paul said, But I was free born. Then straightway they departed from him which should have examined him: and the chief captain also was afraid, after he knew that he was a Roman, and because he had bound him.
Acts 22:25-29 - AKJV

Paul said he was not a citizen of any mean city. He was born in city as a Jew under Roman rule raised under Roman law. He never said he was a citizen of Rome as you claim. That why he said he was free born because he was not citizen anywhere.

But Paul said, I am a man which am a Jew of Tarsus, a city in Cilicia, a citizen of no mean city: and, I beseech thee, suffer me to speak unto the people.
Acts 21:39 - AKJV

Tribe of Benjamin is a single wolf. Paul is a single person not plural wolfs or plural prophets as you claim. The verse in Matthew 7:15 is speaking about a time that has not happened yet is still future.

Lydia was not the first person saved by Paul Acts 14:27 God opened a door of Faith to the Gentiles as far back as Abraham faith is what saves someone when is accounted as righteousness Genesis 15:6. Also Acts 13:47-48.

The book of Revelation is still all yet future and has nothing to do with today. It is still yet future and none it has come true yet. It’s the fulfillment of Daniel 70th week of prophecy.

Paul did not teach eating meats sacrificing to idols. He said a idol is nothing in the world and that there is no other God but one. He’s telling them there is no more idols to sacrifice to; but to us there One God, the Father, and One Lord Jesus Christ. However there is not that knowledge in every man so he said don’t eat if it offend the weaker brother who does not have that knowledge.

As concerning therefore the eating of those things that are offered in sacrifice unto idols, we know that an idol is nothing in the world, and that there is none other God but one. For though there be that are called gods, whether in heaven or in earth, (as there be gods many, and lords many, ) but to us there is but one God, the Father, of whom are all things, and we in him; and one Lord Jesus Christ, by whom are all things, and we by him. Howbeit there is not in every man that knowledge: for some with conscience of the idol unto this hour eat it as a thing offered unto an idol; and their conscience being weak is defiled. But meat commendeth us not to God: for neither, if we eat, are we the better; neither, if we eat not, are we the worse. But take heed lest by any means this liberty of yours become a stumblingblock to them that are weak. For if any man see thee which hast knowledge sit at meat in the idol’s temple, shall not the conscience of him which is weak be emboldened to eat those things which are offered to idols; and through thy knowledge shall the weak brother perish, for whom Christ died? 1 Corinthians 8:4-11 - AKJV

If Ananias died in Acts chapter 5 and it can’t be the same one in Acts chapter 9. How many different John are there in the Bible? Scripture reveals the Ananias that came to Paul was a devout man having good report of all Jews.

And one Ananias, a devout man according to the law, having a good report of all the Jews which dwelt there,
Acts 22:12 - AKJV

How many different Judas are there in the Bible. I count two both chosen by Jesus. Your example mean nothing. Paul conversion was several years after Judas died there again you can not prove that it is the same Judas that betrayed Jesus since he was alway identified as Judas Iscariot or the one that betrayed Him or traitor. In Matthew 1:2 there was a Judas in Abraham’s, Issac’s, and Jacob’s blood line so are the Jewish fathers false also since the name is associated with them? Is this a red flag also? Notice the words left out of Acts 9:11 that you have to assume that are in the verse is Iscariot and betrayed Him or traitor are all missing.

Guess what you missed there were two Judas that were apostles and one was the brother of Jame which is who’s house most likely it is. He is also spoken of in Luke 6:16 and Acts 1:13

and Judas the brother of James, and Judas Iscariot, which also was the traitor.
Luke 6:16 - AKJV

And when they were come in, they went up into an upper room, where abode both Peter, and James, and John, and Andrew, Philip, and Thomas, Bartholomew, and Matthew, James the son of Alphæus, and Simon Zelotes, and Judas the brother of James.
Acts 1:13 - AKJV

There again the Romans road that is by faith in what God said those that believe God have imputed righteousness just as Abraham. That was pre established 430 years before there was any law or commandments given when Abraham was still considered a Gentile and still uncircumcised. It’s clearly stated in Genesis 15:6 before the covenant of circumcision in Genesis 17.

1 Peter is a book written to Jews and is still a book that is looking for Jesus second coming after the body of Christ will be raptured out. Everything in it is still yet future when God will be focusing back on the nation of Israel. Right now God is dealing with Gentile and any Jew that comes to him by faith in Paul’s my gospel.

The law is only done away during this present dispensation of God’s grace. It will come back into play during the 7 years of tribulation and during the 1000 year reign of Christ on earth and also under the new covenant which is not to the body of Christ. Question to you about the law. What was going on from Genesis 3 until Exodus chapter 19 when the law was given to Israel?

Jesus warning about the dessert is speaking of the time of Daniel 70 week in Danial 9 which has not happened yet.

Look for the time words when and then.

When ye therefore shall see the abomination of desolation, spoken of by Daniel the prophet, stand in the holy place, (whoso readeth, let him understand:) then let them which be in Judæa flee into the mountains:
Matthew 24:15-16 - AKJV

The when is in the last three and a half years during the great tribulation of the seven years of tribulation.

for then shall be great tribulation, such as was not since the beginning of the world to this time, no, nor ever shall be.
Matthew 24:21 - AKJV

Then after the great tribulation starts if any man come to you in the dessert.

Then if any man shall say unto you, Lo, here is Christ, or there; believe it not. For there shall arise false Christs, and false prophets, and shall shew great signs and wonders; insomuch that, if it were possible, they shall deceive the very elect.
Matthew 24:23-24 - AKJV

Wherefore if they shall say unto you, Behold, he is in the desert; go not forth: behold, he is in the secret chambers; believe it not.
Matthew 24:26 - AKJV

The verse you use does not say they will claim they seen him in the dessert but that he is in the dessert. That’s two different thing you are trying to claim.

None of these scriptures have taken place yet. When did the abomination of desolation stand in the holy place?

You should try adding some context to your teaching instead of proof texting the verse.

No where does Paul tell anyone to say a sinners prayer the church twistyianty not from the Bible.

Where do you get Christian from in Matthew chapter 7. They were first called Christian in Antioch 10 years after the cross when Barnabas went looking for Paul and seen the grace of God in Acts 11:26. You can’t say establish in AD 43 then say no when it was really established was AD 30. Again the is church twistyianty. Also Matthew 7 is still yet future that would be who verse 15 is speaking of false prophets.