The Real Reason Starlink Will Change The Internet!

The Real Reason Starlink Will Change Everything! Let's talk about how the SpaceX Starlink satellite system will disrupt communication systems, lets review all the news and updates for Starlink....

Last video: The Real Reason SpaceX Won The Moon Lander Contract...

►You can use my referral link to get 1,500 free Supercharger km on a new Tesla:

🚘 Tesla 🚀 SpaceX 👽 Elon Musk

Welcome to the Tesla Space, where we share the latest news, rumors, and insights into all things Tesla, Space X, Elon Musk, and the future! We'll be showing you all of the new details around the Tesla Model 3 2021, Tesla Model Y 2021, along with the Tesla Cybertruck when it finally arrives, it's already ordered!

You can use my referral link to get 1,500 free Supercharger km on a new Tesla:

#Tesla #TheTeslaSpace #Starlink

[joepepito]

I was a ViaSat customer. They are a joke with the speeds they claim. I got my Starlink 9-10 months ago. What a game changer. I live in northwestern Pennsylvania. N satellite was our only option for high speed internet

[andypcguy]

I'm stuck with Frontier bonded DSL 18Mb down and 2 up, already paid my starlink deposit. Can't wait to have decent broadband.

[devastor]

”Heat is just dissipated in space” <- Now, that is the major problem with heat in space. Space is cold they say, but as weird as it sounds like, it is actually very very difficult to get rid of heat in space, in vacuum without air it will just not go anywhere. The only way is to radiate it away and that is not very efficient way to get rid of it. E.g. ISS has massive radiator panels and they don’t do that much to generate heat. Due to this issue I see it very unlikely that we’d see any datacenters in space any time soon.

[daniel__]

Biggest difference Starlink will make which will also make them billions is latency between continents. The latency will be much reduced because light travels faster in space than in fiber plus it does so in a straight way. Financial centers for example would pay looots of money for that.
Latency is also what makes it different from other satellites, for another reason. Starlink flies close to 100x lower than todays internet satellites, reducing the distance information has to travel substantially. Making the latency almost as good as fiber compared to barely useable >500ms ping from other satellites.
Rural areas, military, ships and planes will love having highest quality internet access anywhere in the world.

[johnpoldo]

I use Lumen fiber for a small building in Florida and need a back-up Internet provider. Starlink appears perfect because it’s different technology and won’t be down at the same time. I don’t mind paying the monthly fee of $99, although use it only 0.1% of the time. Wish I could get it before mid-2022.

[evannoynaert]

I think one side benefit of Starlink is that it will effectively cap what cable companies can charge for internet access and it will penalize those who have terrible customer service. Lots of people who have access to land-based internet only have one provider. They keep raising their rates. There is no 5G in our area. Our local company has announced publically to stockholders that increasing their price faster than inflation. They plan for that being a longterm strategy. Right now they are at $95 per month for mediocre speed. That means Starlink is an option people can go to. If the cable company raises their rates much above $95 it makes sense to jump ship. Or if I have service problems and I am told it will take 2 weeks to get a tech out to our house I can tell them I can have a starlink dish delivered in less than a week.

[maladaptedmalarkey]

Layer 2 networks are already possible (they don’t touch the internet). Don’t get me wrong. Starlink is epic and will change the world, but still. Starlink’s strengths will be its global availability, and ultra-low point-to-point latency.

[tetuhikelly]

Seeing as how they have acquired Swarm Technology maybe they could offer a different connection model for those in remote areas who cannot afford the $99/month fee. Maybe $10 a month and 25Mbps down and 3 Mbps up is ample for those doing just email, FB etc but not gaming or delivering HD video. I live in the Cook Islands and we get 8Mbps down and 0.5Mbps up but pay up to $199/month for capped 250Gb. Those minimum FCC speeds are going to be blown out of the water and this will mean the minimum for FCC will be 100Mbps plus down. So offering a smaller down speed for a few dollars would be a godsend for us on our remote islands.

[JohnDoe-txlq]

don't forget those large numbers are 3-month introduction prices, 06:45 after that, $99 for 100+Mbs is relatively cheaper! (Also depends on all the different set-up fees) In comparison, 'Gold Unlimited' plan becomes half the speed at $50/m MORE than Starlink.

[imnotanalien]

Even though the monthly fee will be $99/month… underdeveloped countries could afford to use it. Maybe not each family…. But villages could afford it…. Like a public library…. Maybe fee per use. Even if it was free… it wouldn’t help because most undeveloped countries have NO infrastructure, and most people don’t have traditional houses with electricity. But having fee per service at a community building could really help increase their economy. Having this satellite internet sounds perfect for 5B people in underdeveloped countries.

[zikv]

In my country 99$ is a bit much specially after an economical crisis, but if the connection was shared this will definitely be worthwhile, the bandwidth will be 4x to 5x better per user than any local isp not mentioning the betterment in the ping quality, only problem is the government may not allow star link because it can't be "watched"

[brianjohnson]

We are sad there is a delay but I'm glad they are updating the satellites.

[WILL_E_]

An individual in poor countries cannot afford it now, but a village could gain access as a community, get their school/library/hospital online. Neighbors will share. Then as satellites and launches get cheaper, and costs come down, then it truly changes life for countless people around the world.

[ToniDJohns]

excellent. yes, knew of this development Jan 2015 at NASA Houston, Texas

[snitox]

I don't think it would be much for Cambodia either. It's fine to build libraries where the internet is crowdfunded and only accessed for important things.

[marvinegreen]

Thinking about 3 shells of starlinks at 3 different altitudes, implies that the intermediate altitude will provide a 3 hop link across a continent while the highest altitude will provide a 3 hop link halfway around the world. Also a 3 altitude network implies that the all LEO mesh network has been abandoned in favor of a lower latency 3 hop network from anywhere to anywhere. Also, if they are using V and K bands for intersatellite communication, are the lasers a later version?

[DavidA]

They just need to work on latency. That’s still the number one thing holding me back. I totally get this is for rural people that don’t have an actual land ISP option but if they are looking to expand to suburbs and stuff like that you’re gonna have to compete with cable and cable is under 10 ms.

[nathanbradforth]

Dude I'm Tesla through and through but I didn't see any probs with cnbs

[HillOrStream]

Signed up for Starlink, paid the hundred-dollar deposit. Was told to expect service by late summer. Then I heard they were telling people "end of October".... Still no word. I suspect that study used the speeds quoted by the two traditional satellite companies and not reality, which is to be barely functional at times.

[chriseddinger]

So I look it up in 2022 they are going to cover Philippines. I'm going to get it and let people use it for a small charge in a little building next to my house. they have cell data here but 1 -3mb Facebook messenger and Mlbb on good days . The kids here really want to play real online video game . Now in the big cities they have up to around 50mb