Equations & Inequalities in less than 20 minutes • A-Level Maths, Pure Year 1, Chapter 3 📚

preview_player
Показать описание
Use this as quick revision, to summarise a playlist, and/or to check that you are ready to tackle exam questions. (Remember you can change playback speed on YouTube if you're in a rush!)

As this early on in this series, let me know what you'd like to see more of in future videos for chapter summaries!

Рекомендации по теме
Комментарии
Автор

At 18:53 aren’t you supposed to use the intersection symbol rather than the union symbol? Because we only want the intersecting area and not all possible areas of all equations combined(which is what union symbol means right)?

twnrtvp
Автор

hi sir you are smashing it with these videos thank you!

fatm
Автор

You are genuinely my saviour, these videos are great for revising quickly pls keep making them 🙏

lucyjones
Автор

the timing with these videos are perfect, also are you going to be this for the wole of Pure year 1? thank you

rKaraa
Автор

Your videos have been really helpful, thank you sir

chris_adu
Автор

I've been struggling with inequalities since GCSEs, thank you so much!!

AdamRyder-jw
Автор

these videos are soo helpful for my upcoming exam for pure 1 thanks appreciate the videos and I will soon join the channel as a member.

jodiali
Автор

a good addition, sometimes the playlists can be long for a chapter that doesnt require too much attention if you've revised it before so itd be tedious

chaska
Автор

Given Two general equations for finding the value of "x" and "y"
1) ax + by = c
2) px + qy = c
Here (a, b, c, p, q are REAL NUMBERS)
Can we write
(ax+bx = px+qx)
( substituting the value of "c"and "c" is REAL NUMBERS like

Is it correct or not
Please help with example 🙏🙏

rkm
Автор

Hello Mr Bicen,
May I ask that we please have these videos in a playlist, please ? - one for Pure 1, another for Statistics 1, etc. Thank you

atep
Автор

if it was kx^2 - 4x - (k+3)

would the value for c be -k-3? as i would have expanded the brackets to get this or would it still remain as k+3

sloco