Simonides Betrayed, Part 3: Uncle Benedict’s Plan

Vlog 226: How Simonides’ Uncle Benedict could create a non-Byzantine Sinaiticus. God bless you all! – David W. Daniels

[SFBCOCA]

Thank you brother David, I hope & pray all is well. We just started our bible based church out here in Oceanside CA. Please keep us in prayer. We will definitely will recommend your website and materials, as they have taught me and helped be become a better pastor. God bless you and keep up the good work😁

[webocoli]

Thanks, brother David. I'm so glad that what we find in the KJB IS the Preserved Word of God through the Providence of God. As a young Christian some 50 years ago I started with KJV but was persuaded by a pastor to embrace the NASB, later the 1881 Revised version, but for 20 years now full circle to the KJV. Hallelujah!

[nashvillain]

*Finally at **7:38**  "Hi, I'm David Daniels from Chick Publications."  LOL*

[joshuaa]

I'll recommend watching the series (really the channel) from the beginning otherwise you'll be lost about what this video is about. In a nutshell, the video series explains who, what, when, where, how & why the Sinaiticus document was written and devised to replace majority text used for translating The Bible in all the modern Bibles. Some of the best Christian / Bible content on the internet. Your "pastors" will hate you for knowing this; and you'll be ostracized for suggesting they get rid of various 'modern' Bibles they "barely" use; in whatever 'talk' they give; which they pass off as a sermon..

[cliffordnewby]

Awesome research and another logical reason to keep my KJV and faith.

[kristinstrickland]

How fascinating to hear the story of Sinaiticus, Simonides, and Uncle Benedict play out . . . . Some questions I am waiting to hear answered are: why didn't the Sinaiticus manuscript ever reach the czar? Did Simonides abandon the project? If so, why? Also, why did Simonides need monks to correct his work? What could they know that he didn't? What kind of corrections were they making? Are these things you can explain to us? I hope so! Thanks and blessings.

[theshepherdsambassador]

It amazes me how you are able to do such great research. It baffles me how you can do all that. I still wonder how you find all this hidden information. Its like you are detective. Its still mystery to me on where you find it and how you find it

[King_James_Bible]

To tell ya the truth, the only four people that I consider to be TRUE scholars are

#1: the Lord Jesus Christ,
#2: Gail Riplinger,
#3: Peter Ruckman,
And #4: you.

And the reason why is ‘cause I’ve seen that you, brother Ruckman, and Gail Riplinger do your homework and defend the King James Bible at the same time, and that in turn encourages me to do some of my own “homework”, so to speak! God bless you, brother!

[Cheecton]

Blessings Brother Daniels. I am curious if you have ever addressed the question of why the Papyri are similar to Vaticanus and Sinaiticus. I assume they are corrupted from the same strain of Alexandrian manuscripts?

[King_James_Bible]

Brother David, I have no idea if this can help you in your study on the controversy: I found out that Erasmus was shown 1 John 5:7 IN Vaticanus

[craigluchin]

David, you would become a "Flat Earther" if you would just lay down your opinion, as you have done here, not taking others opinions, and do your own thorough research of this subject. That's what I had to do and a year later I knew that the globe is a strong delusion. God Bless.

[BeholdTheTruth]

Why do you never address the undeniable fact that the KJV twice makes God an outright liar?
That is plain deceitful.

[jpm]

I love the KJV. I don’t like the modern English. Loses reverence. However I don’t condemn the other translations. We have bigger problems in the church right now. Which translation we are reading, I don’t think is one of them. The church nowadays defends the truth yet refuses to obey, repent, be endowed with power and then turn the world upside down by studying it and submitting to Jesus. I do love the KJV when it uses the word “study”

[jpm]

I respect this ministry, nevertheless I believe the God’s revelation is plainly expressed in any bible translation. Does any of the other translations say something like: Jesus is not the way the truth and the life? Or utterly deny the doctrines for salvation? Show me which translation denies the deity of Christ? I think there isn’t a perfect translation. I do compare and always go back and check with the kjv though.
Why do we have to complicate the plainly revealed truth of God? So, if a missionary or apostle goes and preach Christ crucified from the NIV and millions repent and believe, then they will all go to hell???

[RomneyGack]

I think it's safe to say that most Orthodox clergy would eat "Bible Believers" for breakfast. Ever since the advent of Protestantism Orthodoxy has rejected this sort of talk. The beauty and mysticism of Orthodox ritual is lost on Protestants.
I also can't help notice that DD does not bad mouth the Greeks for having a church named for Our Lady. Is he trying to get on someone's good side?