Historical Reliability of the Gospels - Craig Blomberg

preview_player
Показать описание
Dr Blomberg speaks at the Thinking? Toronto Conference on April 22nd 2016

Рекомендации по теме
Комментарии
Автор

Jesus is Lord no matter what opinion we may have and I love him because he is so real to me amen

cfcameron
Автор

One of the best in the field of biblical truth. Every anti-theist should read and take professor Blomberg seriously. He has been a blessing to those of us who are always open to truth.

randypacchioli
Автор

I'm watching this to challenge my knowledge. I'm a lapsed, formerly very happy "new convert" Eastern/Roman Catholic. Off topic: there is a lot of good stuff in the bible for secular people as well. The good book is the Youtube of the former millennium.

AtticusStount
Автор

I wonder was any of it inspired by God not just man's ideas? You wouldn't know that from the presentation.

cvanhaelst
Автор

Maybe Mathew Mark and Luke are so much alike because they are describing the same events? Maybe they are different because they are different authors moved by the Holy Spirit of God to present Jesus as a Jewish King in Mathew, a suffering servant in Mark and the Son of man in Luke. John is a heavenly Gospel so his overlaps less. I don't know I trust the Word of the living God over the random speculations of men.

jamesbowman
Автор

Do you have any physical evidence for a physical JC?

robertlight
Автор

It is completely rational to believe everything you've been told, apparently.

tedgrant
Автор

I know that God is right-handed.
I also know that Olive Oyl is the girlfriend of Popeye.
And that Batman wears his underpants on the outside.

tedgrant
Автор

THIS SPEAKER IS NOT SUITABLE FOR "PRIME A CLASS OF 10-15 NO MORE !

jamesanonymous
Автор

Around the 8 minute mark I threw up in my mouth a little bit and turned the video off. By the way that the comments were moving, Iactually thought this guy might have had some point to make about the field. That was embarassing.

erik
Автор

Oh god it hurts. This guy almost says three fallacies a sentence. He's clearly never been interested in the topics of logic and epistemology. Or historical method.

erik