Are the Gospels Reliable? w/ Dr. Daniel Wallace (R&T Highlights)

Are the Gospels Reliable? w/ Dr. Daniel Wallace (R&T Highlights)

#newtestament #textualcriticism #catholic #pope #bible #theology #debate
____________________________________________________________________
Disclaimer: Any view expressed by a host, contributor or guest is not necessarily reflective of the views of other hosts, contributors or guests.

🔴PLEASE HELP THIS CHANNEL GROW🔴

🔴SUPPORT

🔴VISIT

🔴LISTEN

🔴VERBUM DISCOUNT
As a fan of R&T, you can get 5 free books and 10% off packages if you use the following link:

🔴PILGRIMAGE

[jperez]

Please do more discussions and expositions of the newly emerging contents of the canonical hebrew gospels. The clarity it gives is immensely valuable to all Christians

[SeattleDinghyer]

Anyone who is being honest with themselves can see that the gospels are not reliable. Even comparing one to the next they disagree with one another they are reliable against each other. Written in mostly illiterate Palestine, at the very most charitable at least decades after the events, it's just not believable. While most people rely on the gospels to reaffirm their faith, they are for me the original reason why I gave up Christianity.

[barryjones]

Why should the historical reliability of the gospels have any significance to an unbeliever?

The fool who concludes "the gospels are reliable, therefore Jesus did miracles, therefore he really is the son of god" has done little more than open his life up to a new possible sin of heresy, since any Christian responding to me here knows that plenty of modern Christian groups also believe the gospels to be historically reliable, however, they still ended up adopting a "heretical" view of Jesus.

Can a skeptic justify not caring about 4 reliable gospels, on the grounds that he can tell from modern Christian reality that if he starts caring, he could get suckered into a Christian "cult" instead of getting led into the "right" Christian church? The Jehovah's Witnesses, Calvininsts, Arminiams, Cheap Gracers, Lordship Salvation Advocates, dispensationalists, covenant theology advocates and Catholics find the gospels to be just as reliable as non-denominational Protestants do.

Why should the skeptic feel the least bit compelled to worry about the implications of the gospels being reliable? Exactly how strong is any Christian argument that anything in the 4 gospels "applies to" unbelievers today in the first place? The reliability of the Pentateuch is irrelevant to whether it "applies to" today, agreed?

[tgrogan]

So how “reliable “ are the “church fathers “ overall? What is the manuscript history of these “church fathers “? Justin Martyr names NONE of the gospels in his writings. Strange if the gospels had Dr. Wallace signs a statement of faith affirming the inerrancy of scripture right? Biased????