Which Tiger II Is Better in War Thunder?

preview_player
Показать описание
In this video, I play both Tiger II tanks in War Thunder. If you are reading this description comment which one you think is better. If you enjoyed the video, I'd appreciate it if you would like and subscribe!
Music: Wir sind des Geyers schwarzer Haufen
Edit: The joke at the beginning of the video is inaccurate, read the comments if you want more information.
#warthunder #warthundertanks #warthundermemes #warthundermoments
Рекомендации по теме
Комментарии
Автор

Its not a porche tiger 2. Its an early production tiger 2. Porche never made a tiger 2 turret

lwscal
Автор

Finally, a WT German video that doesn't have Erika in the background for the 999th time

SpruceReduce
Автор

I think both are equally great.Tiger II P has the weaker turret but it has a lower BR so it’s fine.

Edit:Oh well...

AFT_G
Автор

tiget II H for me, even tho its 6.7, I got multiple nukes on it and I even aced my crew just playing (1800 kills on record)

tensa.
Автор

Everyone : Oh no Tiger ll,

Me : hold my spaghetti and pizza "loads HEATFS or APDS 🗿"

elnewbie
Автор

The 2p is better tier for tier and I will die on that hill. If something can pen the 2p’s cheek, they have to center it on the middle. If someone can pen the 2H cheek, they shoot anywhere. The 2p has no weak spot on the back of the turret ring, and most importantly, can’t get creamed by 7.7s

nova
Автор

It probably didn't make too much of a difference, but you used bushes on the II (H) but not on the II (P)

agentquack
Автор

That one Jumbo Mains Nightmare:
Tiger II

WillyWanker
Автор

The Tiger 2 SLA.16 rn: In about to end this man’s whole career.

The 105mm Tiger 2: I was created by the phrase Dream On, though I wasn’t really actually made :(, but I would still beat the life out of the SLA.16.

yourlocaldutchball
Автор

i'm WildCat0 and you indeed put me in your video like you said, thx xD

SCP--J-mohj
Автор

I prefer the 105 tiger cause of nuke shell

maral
Автор

I always performed better in P version than H. Maybe its the BR. But still I think the P turret has more chances on causing ricochets or volumetric penetration issues. Also not to forget also has a lower profile turret. But H looks much better.

MiguelDarkTiger
Автор

I find that the tiger two p has a higher 4isk reward. If you know how to angle as an enemy fires, the shell is almost guaranteed to bounce on the side of the turret. And since its a lower br, if you can master that, you stand to do very well as long as you are mindful of Italian boys and other heat slingers

casematecardinal
Автор

Finally, a german tank video not using erika... thank you!

mrra
Автор

Liked for not using “Erika” as background music

texassherman
Автор

I played both tiger 2s at 6.7. They play the same in a uptier, everyone penetrates your turret all the same.

morva
Автор

music :"Wir sind des Geyers schwarzer Haufen"

НикитаМартынов-хн
Автор

Personally i prefer the tiger 2 P as enemy's will gladly try their luck with the turret weakspot, therefore being infront your gun where you can shoot them.
Instead on the H model they're less willing to risk even being seen by you (and in the case of american 76mms, completely incapable if they want to live/kill), so they'll flank and force a position with no counterplay.
Plus the H has a higher BR that so wonderfully lets you face the 7.7 T-10 (T-10A i think?) Which you can do physically nothing about, whilst without the kugelblitz (for some dumb reason) at 6.7 you only really gain the jadgtiger, which is cool i guess.

bjboss
Автор

Tiger II P is slightly faster than H because it's a tiny bit lighter. Not significant enough to matter much, but if you really need the extra acceleration, you'd be better off picking P.

standard-carrier-wo-chan
Автор

I felt bad for the M6A1.
Less frontal armor than a sherman.

TheTISEOMan