Entangled Minds and Beyond - Dean Radin, Ph.D.

Anecdotal reports of “experiential entanglements” – spontaneous mind-to-mind and mind-to-matter interactions – can be found throughout history, in all cultures, and at all educational levels. For over a century, such experiences have stimulated controlled scientific experiments to explore whether the anecdotes were best explainable as coincidence, confabulation, or genuine anomalies. Based on analysis of thousands of experiments published in peer-reviewed journals, the cumulative evidence is now clear: mind-to-mind and some forms of mind-matter interactions have been demonstrated beyond a reasonable doubt.

For the most part, this evidence is ignored or denied within the academic mainstream, probably because it implies that certain long-held assumptions about the nature of brain, mind and matter – assumptions that are inculcated in universities and repeated as fact in textbooks – are in some cases wrong and in others in need of radical revision. I will review the evidence for these entanglements, the resistance to the evidence, and the implications for a more mature science of the future

Dean Radin, PhD (Psychology, University of Illinois), has been
Senior Scientist at the Institute of Noetic Sciences since 2001. He
previously held appointments at Princeton University, University of
Edinburgh, Bell Labs, and SRI International. Author and co-author of over 200 technical and popular articles, he has also written several books including the bestselling The Conscious Universe (HarperOne, 1997), Entangled Minds (Simon & Schuster, 2006), and Supernormal (Random House, 2013).

[dbkurz]

Radin's findings are absolutely astounding, from both statistical and historical perspectives. The very idea that mind is interacting with matter and in fact manipulating it over a distance to some extent hints at a much deeper rabbit hole. Frankly, if the math was not so absolutely solid I cannot see how any 'reasonable' person could believe this. But the math is solid. The studies are solid. And repeatable. While people are free to draw wherever conclusions they want from the findings, frankly, I think that if the conscious or unconscious group or individual mind can manipulate matter over a distance then life after death is certainly in the cards. 

[waterholdsasignal]

Dr. Rabin, it's not just the mental affect. The mystery of the observer suggest a riddle. When observed, a particle takes form. When not observe, a wave takes form. Q: Why? A: Define the mystery in an observer's focus intent. 1. The visible shape or configuration of something. 2. A particular way in which things exists or appears; a manifestation. 3. The verb, bring together parts or combine to create (something). It means that when an observer exercise focus intent, the nature of being is not created automatically from a large database. It's only created when the observer becomes one with the database. The riddle of the observer is a requirement. The mystery, then, is a requiring: the observer must choose, a voluntary, free-will offering.

[crypticnomad]

In my head I see a structure of reality where awareness is fundamental. Awareness, in my view, has 3 dimensions from which 3 dimensions of space and time are mirrored.

[QED_]

The more that I research this in conventional physics circles . . . the more struck I am by how much physicists admit to not understanding what is going on with quantum mechanics.  QM is 100 years old now and the best that physicists have been able to do in that time is to definitively confirm by rigorous experimentation (Delayed Choice Quantum Eraser and etc) . . . that they don't understand what is going on.  In fact, it seems that for maybe the first time in the history of physics . . . the amount of new stuff they don't know (dark energy, dark matter, etc) is increasing faster than the new stuff that they do.  Sheeesh . . .

[keithtaylor]

At Berkeley they took a sea worm and sensed its neurons firing with entangled particles. When that is entangled with the D-wave computer and a human brain is substituted for the sea worm. The 2 parts crystal 1 part conductor of nano size with entangled particles in the the Chrystal allowing the sound of the enviroment of the brain to map out unique brain patterns . The Mind is read from any where, perfectly. nanobugged the book to live.

[batmandeltaforce]

When you consider the Butterfly Effect, it is easy to see that your mindset can save your life or lose it, happy or sad, every duality known to man. We are what we want to be:)

[_HenS_]

It would have been nice if there had been videos of the interference patterns actually changing during the meditation, rather than only relying on graphs.

[natashapope]

No doubt. Check out quantum mechanics, The Julia Set.etc...and so much more. Very exciting stuff.

[GrayderFox]

Oh, wow. There was a change with people, but...not the Linux box? That's...really interesting. I'll just be over here wondering how particles can differentiate between those things while quietly wondering when the world stopped making sense.

[richardflynn]

Wouldn't meditation render all this moot or reinventing or will this advance meditation?

[phanesrekk]

4:54 those percentages dont add up.. just sayin

[ShannonLooper]

Now I want to see macro level results. :)

[threehorsesxxx]

If a robot can be conscious then it can perform esp also . Turns out

[WootMapler]

You can use this to communicate with extraterrestrials and vice-versa

[oliverford]

If consciousness is required, how did conscious beings like us evolve? If there was always a God-like consciousness observing everything, why are there quantum effects?

[dennisdahl]

Is this experiment still available online to try?

[njmikec]

huh I thought there was no 'they'.

[bikkeltje]

The funny thing is that despite all the blabla nobody knows what quantum mechanics actualy means....

[alexandrumoise]

in the double slit, photons always behave like a wave. Even single photons interfere with themselves. This guy doesn't have his facts straight.