What's Important For Defending Scientific Rationality

Here's a 5 minute clip from my longer 30 min video on Peter Boghossian's Culture War 2.0 essay. This is from near the end where I summarize my critique of his framing of the issue, and how I would frame what's really important in a defense of scientific rationality.

[LANGLADA]

So... As a lay person, would it be safe to build a premise around this observational conclusion?

A) Virtues could also be considered as morals?
B) Mitigating errors requires an agreement amongst the involved to accept certain precepts that are undeniable and have no fallacies. In a sense a belief system of virtue.
C) The virtues are aligned with Biblical principal for which we must ignore, due to religious bias, and presume we are the originators and not the imitators. Yet... Biblical principal encourages the same methodology.

Interesting conundrum. Enlighten me some more. This paradox of thought is intriguing to enquiring minds.