Disney Villains Comeback

It's not what you probably expected but then again, why not.

[poweroffriendship.]

_Mickey's House of Villains_ has all the iconic Disney animated villains come together to take over the limelight is the great way to celebrate their villainous legacy throughout the decades.

[OpticalSorcerer]

I don't need sympathetic villains (I like them, though), but I do want villains/antagonists with depth, like Frollo, who aren't just evil because the plot needs them to be, but has an actual personality and nuance.

[forrestdupre]

Keep in mind that many Disney movies came from books with the villains already in the story.

[johnnycage]

Churnabog should be the main villain that brings all the villains together for a huge movie crossover.

[annien.]

I'm SO hyped for the upcoming Villains Land in Disney world! I bet it's gonna be AWESOME!!! Also, I can't wait to get to work at Disney Animation and create villains that are actually villains! I have a ton of great story ideas that'll become fantastic, amazing, impressive sure-fire Disney blockbusters!

[michaeljordan]

You can't have light without Shadows and you can't glow with out darkness to cover you.

[JoshuaLowe-ciwo]

7:14 Encanto

That movie made us think Bruno was going to be a villain, but he was actually trying to fit in the family.

[milo_thatch_incarnate]

So cool to see your face! I've been following for a long time, and I love you content!

I think _everyone_ can admit that the main problem ALL the 2010s and 2020s Disney villains have is a complete lack of _dramatic presence._ The last *_memorable_* villain we got from them was Mother Gothel, and that was _14 years ago!_ All the villains after that either have "good intentions", which makes them boring (Namarri, Alma Madrigal, Te Ka, Ralph in WBTI), OR if they WERE a straight villain, they were just... *small* (Hans, Bellwether, Callaghan, King Candy, Tamatoa, that Wish king guy).

Like, that last bunch are all technically "evil crazies"... but they just feel undramatic and petty next to Scar, Maleficent, Ursula, Frollo, Jafar, Facilier, or MY personal forgotten favorite, Madame Medusa. (And SO many more from before 2010.)
Tamatoa comes closest, but he's still not the same as any of those. THOSE villains had _presence, _ drama, magnificence, and grandiosity.

[DiegoMatos-uu]

I am glad that Disney Villians are finally getting a land but Aldone, please make a video on either Harry Potter or Deadpool and Wolverine! I want you to talk about the Wizarding World outside of Disney/Pixar/Marvel/Star Wars/Dreamworks!

[lhadzyan]

Back on the movies from Snow White in 1937 till The Black Cauldron in 1985 the villains were the big deal to make the movie plot to MOVE ON and to make the main characters to develop as well in contrast. Of course there were movies where the villains kinda got a minor role on that or were more even paired with the main characters plot development on their own but those movies were kinda less used for the classical way on how the stories were done since the 30s till the 80s (though since the 60s there kinda happened a slow-burn developing on that way henceforth the villains disminished a lot of the previous roles they got).

Then since The Great Mouse Detective on 1986 thereafter till Wreck-It Ralph on 2012 the movies kinda got a BALANCE between both the villain development and involment on moving the plot but the main heros also moving it on their own henceforth the Disney Reinassance movies are rather VERY COMPLEX and COMPLETE for previous standard or more recent ones, thus on the 2000s they simplified a bit leaving the villains the most simple they could trying to invest on heroes on themselves. (Of course there were exceptions as Treasure Planet on John Silver, Meet the Robinsons on the true nature of the apparent main villain and even Stich on Lilo & Stich kinda starts being a VILLAIN himself!!)

However since Frozen on 2013 all wen´t awry for villains each time more, being actually the main exceptions on this, Moana were Tamatoa though not being a main villain he is a very memorable classical type on his short scene on the movie, and on Encanto there was actually found a clever way to make all work even WITHOUT properly a villain there. (Though there actually is one but not Grandma Alma herself but the jealous and mischevious cousing Dolores and she got rid on her own goals anyways too, though maybe Bruno´s prophecy might do some justice in the future against her!)

[JoshuaLowe-ciwo]

Disney should regain the guts to create complete monsters like Scar & Frollo

[NorySapp]

Both Encanto and Brother Bear didn't have a villain actually and that's why i love it. Movies about dysfunctional family doesn't need a villain as we saw in both in the films we can see the reason on why they are like that and why their relationships are slowly deteriorating except at the very end. Encanto in particular is a perfect and great example focusing on the themes of Generational trauma, family conflict and sibling rivalry. Its very realistic when you think about it. Most people from all around the world have that kind of family oriented problem and broken relationships.

[lhadzyan]

I could consider there are kinda 4 to 5 tier-groups of villains to classify them considering both their classical and modern impact-trascendance on popular culture and their powers or relevance of level:
S Tier - All mightiest powerfull trascendental villain types, mostly magical (though not necesarily always) and usually including both classical and modern types, they´re the iconic ones!!
A Tier - Nearly to the level of the previous type, usually not magical (though there could be ones as well) and are mostly modern type, since the Reinassance era thereafter. They´re hard to diferentiate from the uppermost level, but usually aren´t so much as iconic either because of having lesser power than the others, although they could be even more charismatic than the previous ones.
B Tier - The average villain type, could be magical or not magical as well but aren´t so much trascendental either because they actually didn´t get much time on the story on themselves, thus hardly being actually a main villain on themselves, and the movies weren´t such a big deal on showing on - though weren´t either a big faillure in all - the characters might get some charismatic iconic times but not always and kinda getting a loyal cult-fan following sometimes. They don´t belong to any particular time, but a lot had happened on the big transition time in between The Jungle Book of 1967 till The Little Mermaid of 1989 and also several modern villains after Disney Reinassance and in the 2010s Revival Age might be involved.
D Tier - The lower type of villains, mostyl nont magical (though could be low-magical type) oftenly are secondary villains or if they´re main villains they still don´t belong to any reasonable well-remembered movie in all, but rather mediocre to big flaws. They don´t belong to any particular time, though a lot had happened on the early time of the 40s anthology films, in the 70s and 80s, the middle 2000s and even since aftter the 2010s revival thereafter on contemporary times. (Several of the surprise villain type could be here indeed!) The non-villain/anti-villain antagonists as Abuela Alma of Encanto or Amos Slade of The Fox and the Hound could be here too or well being excluded as they aren´t villains in all properly on themselves.
X Tier - Unclassificable villains but on a quite special relevance on themselves for particular meaning or audiences, like Judge Claude Frollo or even Chernabog and The Horned King, because though they might be belonging to either or both S and A tiers, their movies were rather a big flow or the characters had some particular issues that actually are even DARKER than the average on greater iconic villains usually. This tier might be ignored anyways too on its existence.

[DiegoMatos-uu]

Here is my Disney villians land:
Revive the Dragon Coaster Concept into a Maleficent Roller Coaster, and add a Battle of the Sunken Treasure style Hades Underworld boat ride!

[JoshuaLowe-ciwo]

When you are a child, you root for the heroes. When you are an adult, you can relate to the villains.

[livingdeadfam]

I was hoping with the recent return of Fantasmic, they would have introduced a life-sized Chernabog animatronic by replacing Maleficent/Murphy! Huge missed opportunity from Disneyland! Great video my friend! 💯

[deakensomoza]

What about Why The Criterion Collection is classic amazing?

[lukasmiller]

I’ll see this video sometime but could you please do one on the five 2D movies of DreamWorks?

[lhadzyan]

King Candy worked great because the big surprise on him wasn´t that he was a villain on his own, it kinda seemed earlier on anyways, but that he was Turbo himself actually, so it wasn´t about the nature of being villain but on who particulary he was!! That´s why the big well-done shock on the climax of the movie. Thereafter since Hans on Frozen all the surprise villains are very weak developed types on them. So the big deal wasn´t to make the characters villain nature as a surprise on themselves but how to build up into that and well actually to add more layers to it for a greater surprise than itself alone!!

Several Pixar characters had a great surprise villain twist better done than on Disney´s ones, but the build-up on them was better done and added MORE stuff on the big reveal on them so the shock of them being villains added more DEPTH than just the issue on them being evil for the sake of them being evil, however overtime even Pixar got lazy on their formulaic variants and people got too much bored and used to this villains variant, henceforth why although there was a great time about this type of villains on the 2000s by the 2010s the formula got OLD so it wasn´t such a big deal overtime! It kinda works better for serialized TV shows but for movies it kinda has less time to develop properly on itself.

[xXGloomuraiXx]

Close enough welcome back twisted wonderland