Nobel Laureate Claims: What the James Webb Telescope Has Seen beyond the Dark Ages…

When even a Nobel Prize winner in physics doubts our current understanding of the universe, everyone knows what the astronomical hour has come! However, Adam Riess is not the only one at his wit's end: the James Webb telescope is currently detecting more and more new structures in space that are in stark contradiction to conventional cosmology! But how can it be that the existence of galactic structures that were previously considered absolutely impossible is being confirmed? What do these puzzling findings mean for future research - and have our previous theories finally had their day?

[yetanothertop]

I made it to 7:11 and then my brian just couldn't take anymore. I love the topic. The information is interesting. But, it's obvious that the intent was to take 2 minutes of text and stretch it into 12:34 of agonizingly slow and repetitive AI voiceover.

[uy]

So we can build a telescope that can spot an object 14 billion years old and millions of light years away but we still cant build a telescope that can spot a rock on the moon ?

[JohnSmith-demz]

I don't like the way hollywood and the makers of these videos make it look like stars and galaxies will wizz by if you are moving fast enough. Even at 100 times the speed of light it wouldn't look like that. Stars are light years away from each other. Also the stars wizzing by remain small like light bulbs, if you were close enough for it to appear to wizz by it would fill your field of view

[canwelook]

What if observed red shift is not caused by expansion at all?

[thekingofmojacar]

I can go to sleep now, the voice and the (repeated) content made me tired, your cosmic fairy tale is my sleeping pill during the summer lull...

[yetanothertop]

Please hire me as the new writer of your text! Please? I mean holy mother of redundantly unnecessary words!

[ronBO]

The perception of the Hubble constant”s expansion is misinterpreted. More like a spaghettification of a universe on its way to the great attractor. The ancient symbol of the OUROBOROS was known many centuries before . The CMB may be the accretion disk residue of an event horizon that was breached over 13.8 billion years ago. So tell me where else would a flat universe be heading?

[jamesanderson]

Scientists have no clue what those are.

[guy]

Mankind, at each era of time, think that they are the most knowledgeable and what they think is the way everything must be..just look at our past and you will see that they just guess

[ericbrown]

How many more of these videos can they make that say the exact same thing?

[xizilionyizzexeliqer]

Maybe every 30 years the redshift gets even more bizarre or out of touch with the models.

[Thehadow]

I still say they forgot the E with all the matter and antimatter collisions.

[Kaimelar]

It's likely because there is an extra component to redshift, aka intrinsic redshift, so that z 14 object maybe isn't 13.6b years old, but much younger.

[harryadipratama]

The only thing human need to do is getting the real insight to truly know what universe is. 😅

[rodeo_cwboy]

The fact "scientist" wanted to force their "agreed and proven" ideas instead of learning and possibly learning new things..

And holy hell, how many times can the same statement be made to extent this video?!?!

[sargepent]

Now we need an even bigger telescope to see "further" than JWST.

[raymonddupree]

The answer to how fast galaxies separate is 67.4 kilometers per second per Mega parsec : or 41.9 miles per second.

[John-niyt]

First they say the universe is expanding, then they will start convincing people the universe is just breathing. According to which laws it dilates? Why? What does it prove?

[billboyd]

1988 - expansion rate slowing - age 13.8b years
2020 - expansion rate speeding up - age 13.8b years..
Everything is moving away from Everything except for Andromeda which is heading right at us...

[josezepeda]

So can you explain to me how some galaxies merge into others? if they all are moving at the same speed?