Understanding Marxism: Change the World | 5 Minute Video

preview_player
Показать описание
Workers of the world, unite! Karl Marx’s famous call to action never caught on with its intended target, the working class. But the intellectual class—the world of academia—swallowed it hook, line and sinker. They are still pushing it today. Why? What do they hope to gain and what does it mean to the rest of us?

C. Bradley Thomspon is the author of “The Redneck Intellectual” on Substack, and America’s Revolutionary Mind: A Moral History of the American Revolution and the Declaration that Defined It.

#marxism #prageru #history #karlmarx

📲 Take PragerU videos with you everywhere you go. Download our free mobile app!

Script:

Engraved on Karl Marx’s tombstone in Highgate Cemetery in North London are the following words: “The philosophers have only interpreted the world in various ways; the point, however, is to change it.”

Substitute the word “professor” for the word “philosopher” (we really don’t have philosophers anymore) and you get right to the core of Marx’s enduring attraction to the contemporary world.

Marx demands that the intellectual class — the professors of law, sociology, history, women’s studies, anthropology, journalism and so on — come out of the Ivory Tower and join the barricades; to see themselves not as the preservers of the dusty past, but the creators of a new and glorious future.

The lure has proven to be very strong. And it’s not hard to understand why.

How much more meaningful, exciting, and romantic to see yourself as an agent of change rather than a mere academic. How much more meaningful, exciting, and romantic to see the young people who fill up your classroom as potential soldiers in the cause.

Send them into the world with the same revolutionary spirit, the same disgust toward bourgeois middle-class values that you feel, and you’ve done your job.

And we must give these lecture-hall revolutionaries their due. Look around. For the most part, they’ve succeeded.

Drill into any current leftist movement — environmentalism, critical race theory, the massive expansion of the welfare state, not to mention diversity, equity and inclusion offices at every university and major corporation — and you will find Marxism at its core: a contempt of the Enlightenment and the Judeo-Christian value system from which capitalism springs.

Marx’s most famous call to action — “workers of the world unite” — was not, of course, to the professoriate, but to the laboring class.

That didn’t work out so well.

Workers, especially in the United States, turned out to be more interested in refrigerators than revolutions. The only barricade they were passionate about was a white picket fence in front of a green suburban lawn. Poor benighted souls, the appeal of Marxism was somehow lost on them — maybe because they didn’t go to college.

But the intellectual class never lost faith — even after Stalin, even after Mao, even after Castro wrecked Cuba, even after Pol Pot murdered millions of his fellow Cambodians, even after Hugo Chavez decimated the strongest economy in South America, the academic elite remained true believers.

Indeed, in a world without faith — where God is dead — Marxism has become, in effect, a substitute religion.

One of the major strengths of Marxism (in contrast to both modern liberalism and conservatism) is the unyielding commitment of its followers to this faith, to bear witness to it, and to act on it.

Marxism summons these followers to join a crusade to destroy the evil that is capitalism and to create the good that is communism. In our secular world, the Marxist ideal gives the Marxist true-believer a reason to live, a reason to die—and a reason to kill.

Monsters like Lenin, Stalin, Mao, Kim Il Sung, Ho Chi Minh and Pol Pot took this to the nth degree and murdered millions. For the record, the latter two were politically “educated” in France. Pol Pot studied at the Sorbonne.

If you think I’m exaggerating the evils of Marxism, if you think Stalin and those other guys got communism wrong but your new Democratic Socialism will get it right, think again.

Marxism leads a society toward a fixed goal: a utopian vision of pure freedom in which the individual is liberated from the “false consciousness” of capitalism. Unfortunately, by Marx’s own definition, the path to this utopia requires the destruction—economically, politically, and morally—of every vestige of civilization as we know it.

Economically, Marxism seeks to destroy free enterprise, the division of labor, profit-and-loss, competition, and material wealth.

Рекомендации по теме
Комментарии
Автор

Hey, PragerU could you summarize the first 3 chapters of Marx's Capital for us? I would love to learn some Marxism here.

TheSonicSpud
Автор

A video entitled “Understanding Marxism” in which some angry guy yells anti-communist cliches at you for several minutes and never once explains anything about what Marxism even is

abe
Автор

Karl Marx with his cannon and hard hat will liberate us!

potatoman
Автор

“It is easier for a camel to go through the eye of a needle, than for a rich man to enter the Kingdom of God”

Yup, Capitalism is totally derived from Christianity. Got it there, polysci man

FrozenElite
Автор

I love how you basically describe capitalism when talking about communism

LuckiiRoux
Автор

this video makes marxism look so cool. thank you

augustopenaspalmeira
Автор

Hey PragurU I was wondering if you could put your sources in the description text box under your videos so that if people want to they can learn more about the subjects you teach

lordmeepsouce
Автор

In South Korea, the number of non-regular workers has increased, and house prices and monthly rents have skyrocketed, so finding a place to live has become a hardship in the sky, and has accumulated dissatisfaction with capitalism. It is very important to go one step further from the vaguely “something needs to change” and to clearly recognize that the problem is capitalism. Let's all shout! The problem is capitalism! Socialism is the answer!

zachable
Автор

"the judeo-christian values from which capitalism spring"
AHHAHHAHHAHHAHHAHHAHHAHAHA

Skyfoogle
Автор

Hey Prager U, I would love to learn more about Marxism, I was wondering if you could discuss historical materialism on your next video, thanks!

diablo
Автор

Whenever i see prager u a vid, i lose hope in humanity by thinking people unironically listen to them. Then i open the comment section and i see that there are still people that can think by themselves

leninbestwaifu
Автор

I like how he’s a Political Science teacher. When I was young I did a 2000 word essay on Karl Marx for my Political Science class, lol.

robfromvan
Автор

We already saw what happens when a public thinker reads the minimal amount of theory (if any) and goes against the actually knowledgeable person on the topic of Marx (Peterson v. Žižek). Gotta love these Think Tanks, you just follow the money and see who uses their ass as a propaganda Jukebox

DjKryx
Автор

"The purpose of education is to give the student the intellectual tools to analyze, whether verbally or numerically, and to reach conclusions based on logic and evidence."

Thomas Sowell,  Inside American Education

russellgay
Автор

I can't believe some people see these videos and go "damn so right this is what Marxism is"

angwlcakw
Автор

Ah, yes, Marxism is just everything I don't like. Environmentalism is Marxism, feminism is Marxism. The haircut that the barber gave me that I was too polite to say I didn't like? Marxism!

caprisun
Автор

Ah yes, the Marx understander has arrived

comrade_leej
Автор

How can this guy be a college professor ?

hostettleralexandre
Автор

I don't understand the point of this videos. It a shallow analysis of different elements. Basically every videos start with the good idea presented by Marx, then twist them in a bad interpretation, and claim that every dictatorship, which said to be communist, followed that interpretation and finally put together every modern movement. So I have to assume that every socialist, communist, feminist, leftist or member of the black life matter is bad(?) just because in the past there were bad communists who use a book as an excuse?

simoneceron
Автор

I love freely choosing to be a sewer cleaner

tatebryant
join shbcf.ru