Stellaris Review

Some great ideas get lost in interstellar bureaucracy.

------------------------------­----
Follow IGN for more!
------------------------------­----

[spikosodes]

1:28
"if the AI is stronger than you, they will declare war. if not, they don't do anything"
AI is very clever. Reviewer, not so much

[derphunk]

“For more on Stellaris, stick with IGN.”
No, I don’t think I will.

[ArvisSc]

am i the only one who tries games that ign gives a lower score instead of a near perfect one?

[Hisnberg]

IGN : 6.3 - It's not Call of Duty

[VivecsTDawg]

1:30 "if they're stronger than you they might declare war, if they're not, they wont do anything" THATS THE F**KIN POINT! why would an empire declare war on you if it isnt capable of winning the war, thats not even logical, this is stupid... 3:37 "as in most paradox games, its fully automated" YA its a "Grand Strategy" not an RTS... IGN should know this and shouldnt even comment on that.

[UndergroundMusic]

New call of duty game : 9/10 excellent

[winteric]

Looks like someone didn't buy up IGN's Ad space...

[lowenstaat]

IGN, I find your lack of competence disturbing.

[TopTibbz]

This is literally the only bad review I have found of this game....interesting

[IronBard]

Pretty sure this guy is new to strategy

[Alex-ebob]

Fun fact: IGN Italian gave this game a 9.3/10! Seems they have some competent journalists at least...

[scsc]

This game deserves to be reviewed again, especially now after all the updates it received.

[AAhmou]

IGN's biggest sin. Giving wrong games for the wrong reviewers.

[revenant]

I was on the fence about buying Stellaris until I came across this IGN review.
Now I am convinced I should buy it.

[TheGuard]

I came here for the lols as I trust steam reviews with overwhelmingly positive score far more than this

[jindhk]

Currently more people playing Stellaris than TF2 in steam(3rd).
This video has so much dislike for a reason.
Review rating 2/10
Game rating 9/10

[pinheadzombie]

i have no problem with the differing opinions of others.  i do have a problem when a professional review is only a few minutes long and does not talk about some of the main components of the game (music, artistic style, leveling up your "heroes", the fallen empires,  species creation using the ethos system, ship customization, the modding capabilities of the game, or rebellions within your empire.)  he name drops Crusader Kings 2, but does not mention the fact that the original version had major problems before several patches and expansions.

[TheAwakeningMission]

So...I should ignore the 94% positive reviews based on 2, 774 players from steam and 78/100 from metacritic and listen to a 6/10 from IGN? Naaah, I don't think so.

[LucasAquinoBrentano]

@IGN Seriously, give this review to someone umbiased!

[rornock]

this Review is worthless.
* he doesn't mention fallen empires
* skips out on how the end game work claiming he "played 50h"( P.S. It has a frighting twist, and is awesome)
* skips all the custimization players can make for there empires
* cant even say the name right at 4:02 calling it "Solaris" showing he doesn't care about the game