Numeric Types in Python - Socratica #Shorts

preview_player
Показать описание
Find our programming playlists here:

Written & Produced by Michael Harrison

#Python #Coding #Shorts
Рекомендации по теме
Комментарии
Автор

Floating point numbers is an adequate descriptor. Real numbers have infinite precision while floating point numbers are truncated to machine precision.

sinecurve
Автор

In electrial engineerings, we also use j instead of i for complex numbers. That's because i is the current notation, thus we'd better find another symbol (j) for representing imaginary numbers. I think Python is an electrical engineer friendly language 😉

MrPioneer
Автор

j is better than i. In physics/engineering/linear algebra it's common to use <î, ĵ, k̂> as the basis vector. Early mathematicians using i for 'imaginary' were confused.

ronaldjensen
Автор

Getting sassy artificial-intelligence vibes 😆. Very fun and informative, thank you socratica

Parallax
Автор

TEACHER: I hope you understand what the video was all about
KID: If you say so.

kirbymarchbarcena
Автор

Yes!! For complex numbers it should “i”, not “j”. I, too, wish to register my disappointment. Which makes the count 2+0i.

mikloslipcsey
Автор

Pls do a video on the calendar module in python

prishasrivastava
Автор

lmao I am also disappointed with the j choice. I didn't realize that complex numbers were possible though!

Bakayaroz
Автор

What does a video feel like when a filmmaker drops out to become a teacher? THRILLING and dramatic!

vanhungle
Автор

As an electrical engineer, I'm 100% on board for the use of "j" for the imaginary part of complex numbers. Just wish my calculator used it too!

Cynthia_Cantrell
Автор

It’s rational numbers not real numbers. And rational complex numbers.

Eldestpi
join shbcf.ru