Is 'Love Is Love' True?

You’re in a conversation and someone says, “People should be able to love and marry whoever they want. Love is love.”

What would you say?

This video offers three things you may want to consider.


And remember to subscribe to our Channel to be notified when we release a new video!

[fghvbn]

Love is Love ! 🌈 We don't choose our sexual orientation or skin color but we can choose to respect everyone and avoid homophobia and racism.

[Paulthored]

Can you tell that the Algorithm has left this video by the wayside?

[Lifewitthemauses]

Thank you for a simply explained video

[spongeintheshoe]

0:22 Not _especially_ same sex-relationships. It's just that heterosexual relationships aren't subjected to the same discrimination that non-heterosexual relationships are, so they don't generally require the same degree of defense.
1:38 True, not all forms of love involve sex or marriage. However, the slogan “Love is Love” specifically refers to _romantic_ relationships, the kind where sexual intimacy and marriage _are_ appropriate.
2:25 We could always use artificial insemination. And besides, only about 7% of the population identifies as LGBTQ+, so I don’t think that’s really a concern.
3:07 So, if the relationship is between consenting adults, why _should_ we condemn it as immoral? You don't really answer that question. (Relationships with minors can be condemned on the grounds that minors can't consent, given their lack of life experience and social inequality with adults.)

[macroman]

The issue is that the phrase "love is love" ignores the fact that the distinguishing characteristic of a homosexual relationship is not love, but a carnal desire. That they love each other is irrelevant to the fact that the distinguishing act reduces the dignity of the individuals involved. That is, it is beneath the dignity of someone made in the image and likeness of God to reduce a sexual encounter to a question of carnal desire.