Reaction To Steven Crowder's Feud With Daily Wire

In this short clip, Patrick Bet-David, Bryan Callen, Adam Sosnick and Vincent Oshana react to Steven Crowder's feud with daily wire.



#valuetainment

[Busted_Knuckles]

"The fairest deal is when both parties are upset about the final agreement "

-Dad

[davidacg]

This will be the biggest Change My Mind episode ever for Steven. LOL

[ThriftShopHustler]

The thing no one mentions about this deal is Crowder is right about the YouTube strike laws. YouTube will just strike him for anything even though that content may be a grey area. In other words, big tech will hold the keys to his future if he signs this deal.

[davidepannone]

Rule #1 for an happy life: NEVER mix friendships and love relationships with work. It NEVER ends well.

[sstteevveenn]

“Independent media” isn’t all that independent when you got a bunch of elite billionaires funding it 😂

[caseyrindal]

I listened to talk radeo for 30 years and the last 15 I felt they were leaving out info. I finally came to the conclusion that they were controlled. That's what crowder was trying to get across to new content creators. Once you sign on to the big contract you will be forsed to avoid certain topics and the whole story is what the audience expects.

[MichaelMartin-ehwl]

From what I understand, Crowder didn't want big tech to control the money Daily Wire was paying. He wanted to Daily Wire to be less dependent on big tech, and did not want new talent to be docked pay based on the strikes or banning or de-moneytizing from the big tech monopoly.

Basically, he wanted the talent to be paid regardless, and able to own their content and move from platform to platform.

[imlove]

Crowder got this proposal 3 months ago. It wasn't even a contract. It was a list to propose terms. Then 2 months ago he asked for 30 million a year which daily wire declined. Then one month ago he made the stop big con website. Also one month ago is when he planned on leaving The blaze. This was premeditated and done in an ugly way

[MonkeyD.Rd]

Steven and Jermey aren’t at odds over money. It’s about their approach to big tech. Jermey believes you gotta maneuver through big tech rules to spread influence, which is what the big ad revenue penalties are for in the opening contract. Steven says if you get demonetized, o well, you rely on fan support so as not to compromise any virtual ground gained.

[Mynameisjoof]

Crowder and PBD on the same show? That’s gonna be an amazing conversation

[lumberzach]

I'm glad to hear crowder is coming on next week. In his first video he said he was gonna be doing some interviews and podcasts and I immediately hoped and thought he would do this one. It seems to me his reason for making this public is to get support behind his idea of creating a network if "big con" (DW) doesn't adjust their model to benefit conservatives as a whole instead of worrying about money as they seem to be doing. Crowder seems to be very idealistic about the conservative movement and is adamant about protecting free speech and ownership of ones content since he's been demonetized for 3 years and has been banned several times. We'll find out next week for sure

[dianec]

I feel like a kid watching my parents getting divorced.

[KingdomAuto]

Looking forward to when you and Crowder can hash this out on the show. Should be a great podcast, keep up the great work!

[samarahroth]

I love that everybody's instant reaction is who's he talking about instead of wait what is he saying

[ericness]

Guys - DW simply provided a Term Sheet - a starting point, with the belief there would be several changes/iterations. It was far from the final draft of a deal.

[mariosilvestri]

This is all for show. Crowder is planning on starting his own production channel. This was a great way to promote it. Marketing 101

[taurianferguson]

I hope Valuetainment thoroughly watches both or by then ALL videos posted by the two parties before the interview.

[barbaraz]

Meanwhile, all this controversy is going down on YT, including our comments, and YT is pulling $$$ the whole time. Anyone else feeling the irony?

[esar]

It's hard to listen to this with a basic understanding of the situation and knowing it has nothing to do with lawyers being too aggressive

[nitetrane]

All I know is whenever somebody says, "it's not about the money" it's about the money.