'We're In a War!' - Steven Crowder Speaks Out After His Feud With Daily Wire

In this short clip, Patrick Bet-David, Steven Crowder, Adam Sosnick and Vincent Oshana talk about Steven's feud with Daily Wire.

#valuetainment #patrickbetdavid

[jimmer]

Why won't Crowder answer the question?

[lostinthewoods]

Personally, I don't trust either one.

[jpk]

The question was "how many times did you go back and forth with The Daily Wire?"
Rephrasing questions to suit your own narrative is not genuine. From Jeremy and Ben's account it wasn't more than 2 times before he decided to blacklist them and registered his website. Then he kept up the dialogue (recording a private call) to source incriminating info despite his decision not to go with them.
Bad faith

[MichaelLupescu]

Steven did a great job not answering any questions about DW.

[K_Type]

How do they not ask him….

“So when you open your new media company, say a talent goes on the air and says something controversial it is banned from all social media platforms, you’re still going to pay them millions of dollars and you will take the financial hit??”

[werrec]

I think MOST ppl took issue w his execution of "exposing BigCon" why didn't he just say no thnx u & then offer his media offerings? Hard not to believe this was all just for attention & clicks....very sad cause I like Steven 😕

[darkrillen]

Crowders good at reframing the question and give a none answer
Should run for president.

[BullytrapFightChannel]

Taking an in-house fight outside was weak, back handed and self serving.

[Col.Klink.]

@pat why didn't you ask Steven why he secretly recorded phone call and released it?

[Greatscott]

I have a lot of issues with the DW. Ben is always about a year late when it comes to critical issues such as Covid, the jab, and Jan 6. With that said, Crowder wanted the protection of a guaranteed paycheck while retaining rights to his own show over the term of the contract. That’s not how this works. His show and accounts would be leased to DW if he wants $50-100+ million.

Also, the penalties were consequences due failing to deliver the agreed upon number of shows, which was 4 per week. That’s completely reasonable given that he’s making $50-100 million (the contract would have gone higher after negotiations).

[cq]

for the chat, the "we're in a war" steven references is not with daily wire. its regarding the ideological war on the platforms.

[johnnylarue]

Crowder is totally dishonest. He also comes off as so sleazy in this interview. He exudes grifter.

[Lance_Gilbert]

Why didn’t Patrick ask him about the phone recording? That’s the most egregious act

[thomaspaine]

Pbd, you missed an opportunity to hold crowder accountable for his questionable details in his story about daily wire. There's a long timeline that doesn't match Steven's story. He had the chance to come back to DW and ask for an offer that doesn't count his YT revenue. He could have negotiated for all of these things he wanted, he just needed to not throw a fit about their business model and burn bridges with wholesome conservative voices. DW did nothing wrong in their negotiations.

[Apc-man]

It’s not 110% penalties. That isn’t true

[philo-aletheia]

Not a tremendous fan of either, but it is pretty clear that what Crowder really wanted was just a sugar daddy.

[rhiannadelerres]

I missed my boys. Glad they r coming back. ❤🙏🏽

[sds]

The whole....young guys coming up Does not seem to fly with me.

[lanalong]

Oh what a martyr. Such a hero for the little guy. No other motive here folks. Nothing suss..

[qreyxvj]

I am still waiting for SC to come out with Steven's Razors and Chocolates. Oh, and still waiting for him to sue the government and win as DW has? Let me know when he even does one of them? I will see you at my 1, 000, 000 birthday party before I hear him trying it. This is the part that everyone needs to look at, DW was singing him, not his team, not anyone else. So every time he would say, "take me out of it", the contract talks were over. Then he moved to just exploit them. Cant have contract talks if one party wants to keep saying "take me out of this".