What are the Remains of Roman Destruction of the Jerusalem Temple? | Bible & Archaeology

What are the REMAINS OF ROMAN DESTRUCTION OF THE JERUSALEM TEMPLE? Find out by watching this video from the Bible & Archaeology DIG BIBLE.

[meghanodonoghue]

This is amazing that they are still here today.

[theprincessthepea]

Why is there no corrosion on the stones if they are old?

[stevecariggillio]

You mean A.D. anno domini (Latin for "in the year of the lord")

[christrighteousnessalone]

So I got a question .. look at the size of those stones, no man or even men could move thos stones it have to be of a higher source to move rocks that big!

[amandablevins]

Could you imagine watching this happen in real time!

[craigadams]

Why haven't the stones been removed or cleaned up by now. Maybe there is something underneath.

[Bryan-hs]

Good Job SPQR!. That temple is an animal sacrifice temple. Its entrance was once covered in blood.

[THOMASS-pu]

Third Temple why can't you get that right?

[Biblical_DNA]

That is the 3rd Temple. Zerubbabel's Temple and foundation was completely replaced under Herod. Herod's Temple was not the same as Zerubbabel's Temple. Jews continued to practice animal sacrifices after 70 CE. This can be seen during the Jewish–Roman wars of the second century CE and in certain communities. So animal sacrifices never came to a complete end. The Samaritans still practice animal sacrifices as in accordance to the Laws of Moses for Passover.

[Peter-foz]

AD, 70 exactly 40 years after Christ's earthly ministry began Jerusalem was overthrown in line with the end of the Hebrew nation in AD 70 the same generation that crucified Christ

[RougeLex]

Remember it was the Byzantine Empire a member of the EASTERN part of the Roman Leg that destroyed Jerusalem not the Western Empire of Roma.

[PortmanRd]

Message from antiquity.
"Don't f*ck with the Romans!"

[drpaulv]

Uhm, yeah. As much as the overpaid tour guides in the Old City would like us to believe that, those are NOT the stones from the 70 AD destruction of the temple. They are likely from much much later. Josephus stated quite clearly that the site was razed to clean dirt (Wars, Book 7, chap. 1). The Romans actually took the time to take all the rubble from that temple away and leave nothing that could potentially be sued to rebuild it. Throughout history, there have been many failed attempts to rebuild the temple. Those stones could be from any one of them. But the likelihood of those being from the 70 AD or Second Temple is right around zero.

[tuvillamaryann]

And Roman Catholicism act like a holy church😅😂