James Webb Telescope Saw First Object Beyond the Dark Ages But What it Found Stunned EveryOne

A serious discovery has sparked debate among astronomers. Recently, for the first time The Webb Telescope observed two ancient galaxies. Intriguingly, these galaxies seem distinct from those familiar to us, prompting questions about their origin within our universe.

Look at this image, what you see here is a very distant cosmic structure shining brightly in the early universe. But, the discovery of this bright object has solved a long standing mystery of astronomy.

Because our current understanding of the universe says that our universe came into existence about 14 billion years ago. After the Big Bang, the universe went through a period of complete darkness called the Dark Ages. This was the time when the universe was filled with clouds of gas everywhere. Even if we built the most powerful telescope ever built, we wouldn't be able to see beyond the Dark Ages. But, for decades scientists have been noticing that some strange light was coming from the dark clouds. This was a big mystery for science, because no one could understand how we could see light beyond the Dark Ages. Because, during the Dark Ages all early sources of light were blocked by dense gas clouds and we should not have seen anything. So, what are these strange lights and where are they coming from? Well, new discoveries from the Webb Telescope have finally revealed this mystery and conclude that what we previously thought about the early universe may need to be revised.

#jwst #webbtelescope #webbtelescopeupdates #bigbangtheory #bigbang #astronomy #galaxies #earlyuniverse #nasa

[kevinwilliams]

I am but a humble layman, but what we are witnessing is a huge paradigm shift of our " understanding" of even the fundamental physics we stick to, like a comforter, I feel more comfortable with Penrose ...the circle of life? Orubus, 'scuse spelling, in our development at a truly conscious level we must accept that WE can be wrong💡

[EpicSpace-yk]

I m eagerly waiting for the confirmation of these two galaxies, I can't imagine what if These two galaxies are real... How can Astronomers explain their existence? Exciting time ahead 👀

[garyfilmer]

Perhaps…Conformal Cyclic Cosmology? I find this theory by Sir Roger Penrose, to be very compelling. Love the discoveries of the JWST, keep them coming! Excellent video, thank you.

[Iampenumbra]

Could the birth of the universe be the result of explosion of a black hole or black holes? Let's suppose it existed a black hole prior to the big bang. This black hole from the prior universe kept swallowing everything within its vicinity and kept growing and swallowing other universes until it exploded that created the big bang, and as a result it created a new universe, which is our current universe. I compared this phenomenon to a man eating food and kept on eating until he no longer could eat anymore, and as a result he vomited and spew out all the food. Our universe is the vomit from the previous black hole.

[watgaz]

Maybe, just like we know and see our closest galaxy Andromeda, JWST is showing us the closest other universe's in the multiverse?

[spocksbrothermadscientist]

a continuous "bang" could explain this confusion.

[davidsault]

It may be that the beginning of the Universe we live in was dominated by White Holes and not Black holes, explaining the size and brightness of the first galaxies and their rate of star formation and the presence of metals in their spectrums when those things were not expected that early. White Holes would spew out matter, creating galaxies until they became Black Holes eventually. Perhaps the Universe just oscillates between White Holes spewing out matter, creating all we have in the Universe, and Black Holes taking in and compressing everything, ad infinitum. Perhaps those times overlap.

[Aelexu]

If these galaxies are really that old, it drives me closer to the existence of multiverse. Multiple "big bangs" could have taken place creating multiple universes.

[Lemonstreetmusic]

Fascinating - you feel that you are watching an onion being unpeeled as scientists and cosmoloigists roll back the timeline of our universe - so where did it all start...?

[oldmanrich]

One way or another it always ends with infinity ♾️
AKA -, we just don't know.🤷🏻
I love it 👍🏻

[gilochoa]

Frankly, the CCC is the only explanation that has ever made sense to me. All other explanations don’t really explain why the universe would just end. If so, how could it just begin. An eternal universe cycling between a beginning and ending, like a giant comic heartbeat, repeated everywhere in nature is a simply elegant solution and therefore does away with the eternal fretting of how old is the universe. It has always existed.

[Kiel-]

Let me just say one thing. Scientists don’t have all the answers. They’re even wrong quite often. They can only go on the data they observe. The difference though, between say, religion, is that scientists are wiling to admit when they’re wrong. And overjoyed to go back and find out the truth.

Maybe the universe is older. Maybe these galaxies are under a lensing effect. I look forward to finding out the next great theory.

[ge]

For 20 or so years now, I've leaned towards the multiverse theory.

[robertcahoon]

So we've cycled back around 400 or so years to a continuous universe. I think we need to reconsider most, if not all, of our previous assumptions given the new information....but that's not what will happen. Instead we wikk purpose more and more oddities or exceptions or constants to allow us to fudge our current understanding to give us another hundred years of so.

[Alachua]

Definitely food for a century of serious thought!

[loxloxxos]

I'm always amazed when scientists say they are amazed at what they see through the James Webb telescope! It's like they know what to expect. Scientists don't know anything about the universe so why surprised!? So be humble and admit that you don't understand the universe, instead of pretending that you have figured it out!

[hariraven]

The age of our universe is said to be about 13.5 billion years and its 93 billion years Isn't this a paradox?

[JungleJargon]

The speed of light C isn’t constant since the measures of time and distance aren’t constant. Changing from 60 kilometers an hour to 60 miles an hour increases your speed. Then if you go from 60 miles an hour to 60 miles a minute it increases your speed again. This what is happening in general relativity when less gravity increases the measure of distance and speeds up the rate of time over large distances. It also means that the earth is younger than what they claim.

[KorAllRBare]

This is fantastic! Finally the Air headed Astrophysicists will have to concede The Universe AKA Everything
that exists right now has one way or another existed and further more it will always exist, in short it's not
whatever Billions of Years old, and that's simply because it's always existed.

[davidhess]

The Universe or Multiverses.... we don't have the proper terminology yet... is/are obviously eternal in my opinion. Nothing else makes sense.